<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116642#M21698</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As ever Tim, thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-22T14:21:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10776#M1553</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community! &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help me with simple question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In CoreXL admin guide&amp;nbsp;we can see, that CoreXL is enabled&amp;nbsp;from 1 CPU (as I can understand this doc):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm?topic=documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/91164" title="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm?topic=documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/91164"&gt;Performance Tuning R80.10 (Part of Check Point Infinity)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79830_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I create a VM with 1 CPU, in cpconfig there is no CoreXL options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image image-4" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79833_pastedImage_5.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I create a VM with 2 CPUs, cpconfig has CoreXL options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-3 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79832_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tell me, please, what is the least amount of CPUs required to enable CoreXL and if CoreXLrequired at least 2 CPUs, why we see one CPU in admin guide? And if CoreXL is enabled with 1 CPU, why there is no options in cpconfig?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10776#M1553</guid>
      <dc:creator>EVSolovyev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T14:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10777#M1554</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have only one CPU CoreXL makes no sense. There is no CPU available to distribute anything to another CPU.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With CoreXL you can distribute the overall load to all or maybe only some CPUs. You need at least two, but better more CPUs to really benefit from CoreXL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes, the documentation is a little bit confusing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10777#M1554</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T14:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10778#M1555</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the same page where you found the table &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79836_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CoreXL does not make sense on one core - you cannot multiply one &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10778#M1555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T14:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10779#M1556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you. I missed this moment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10779#M1556</guid>
      <dc:creator>EVSolovyev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T14:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10780#M1557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I do not understand the table line with 1 CPU.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10780#M1557</guid>
      <dc:creator>EVSolovyev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T14:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10781#M1558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is a good point!    Me neither&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:49:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10781#M1558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T19:49:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10782#M1559</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At R80.20 there's a new hack to turn the CoreXL instances on the fly on and off. Here is an example with 3 FW wokers!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79872" class="image-1 jive-image" height="97" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79872_pastedImage_2.png" width="371" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now start the command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# fw ctl multik stop&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; stop CoreXL instance 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79873" class="image-2 jive-image" height="32" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79873_pastedImage_3.png" width="283" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79874" class="image-3 jive-image" height="105" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79874_pastedImage_4.png" width="386" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# fw ctl multik stop&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; stop CoreXL instance 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79876" class="image-5 jive-image" height="34" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79876_pastedImage_6.png" width="289" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79877" class="image-6 jive-image" height="100" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79877_pastedImage_7.png" width="389" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# fw ctl multik stop&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;The last instance cannot be disabled:-)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="79878" class="image-7 jive-image" height="41" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79878_pastedImage_8.png" width="295" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can activate it again per:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# fw ctl multik start&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Conclusion: &lt;BR /&gt;CoreXL 0 cannot really be deactivated under R80.10+:-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More see here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk98737&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=CoreXL%22" title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk98737&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=CoreXL%22"&gt;ATRG: CoreXL&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/10782#M1559</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-07T15:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116599#M21688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Silly question - if I have a openserver license for 2 cores is there anypoint in turning on COREXL?&amp;nbsp; If I disable this will it still use the two cores, or simple use one of them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116599#M21688</guid>
      <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T08:22:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116638#M21694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was mentioned in my book, whether disabling CoreXL on a 2-core system is desirable will depend on a lot of factors.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With CoreXL enabled, the split is 2/2 with the two cores each acting as both an SND and Firewall Worker (kernel instance).&amp;nbsp; While both cores are having to pull double duty and constantly switch context/roles, it does allow more than just one core to process traffic should a large majority of it get concentrated in either the Accelerated Path (handled by SND) or the Medium/Firewall Paths (handed by Firewall Workers).&amp;nbsp; It also allows both cores to empty NIC ring buffers in a timely fashion and help avoid RX-DRP frame loss.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However if CoreXL is disabled, core 0 becomes just a SND and core 1 is just a Firewall Worker.&amp;nbsp; The coordination overhead of CoreXL between multiple Firewall Workers, and the coordination overhead of SecureXL between multiple SNDs is no longer present, thus freeing up a fair amount of CPU time to potentially move more traffic.&amp;nbsp; The downside is that if one core or the other gets fully saturated doing whatever it is doing, the other core cannot help at all thus creating a bottleneck while all possible CPU resources are not being fully utilized.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As mentioned in my book, the only way to determine if disabling CoreXL will help (which is essentially going to a 1/1 split) is to carefully baseline CPU utilization and network error counters with CoreXL enabled, then disable it and see what happens to CPU utilization and network error counters.&amp;nbsp; Disabling CoreXL on a 2-core system may help overall performance or it may not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116638#M21694</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T13:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can CoreXL mechanizm works on 1 core?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116642#M21698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As ever Tim, thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-CoreXL-mechanizm-works-on-1-core/m-p/116642#M21698</guid>
      <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T14:21:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

