<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Client-Initiated TLS Renegotiation DoS in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Client-Initiated-TLS-Renegotiation-DoS/m-p/112606#M21182</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The relevant CVE for this issue is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1473" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;CVE-2011-1473&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is not something we are vulnerable to per: &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92447" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Specifically: Check Point puts all sorts of protections against DoS on the gateway (limiting the number of connections, limiting the amount of data, etc.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-06T08:42:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Client-Initiated TLS Renegotiation DoS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Client-Initiated-TLS-Renegotiation-DoS/m-p/112605#M21181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have had a pen test performed and an issue has been raised for our Gateways A,B and HA external IP's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen there "may" be a IPS Protection that could help with this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TLS Client Initiated Renegotiation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if we enabled this, the CP would potentially block this but we haven't actually fixed the issue at hand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would anyone know a fix for the attached or seen it themselves?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Client-Initiated-TLS-Renegotiation-DoS/m-p/112605#M21181</guid>
      <dc:creator>NeilDavey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-06T08:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client-Initiated TLS Renegotiation DoS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Client-Initiated-TLS-Renegotiation-DoS/m-p/112606#M21182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The relevant CVE for this issue is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1473" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;CVE-2011-1473&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is not something we are vulnerable to per: &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92447" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Specifically: Check Point puts all sorts of protections against DoS on the gateway (limiting the number of connections, limiting the amount of data, etc.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Client-Initiated-TLS-Renegotiation-DoS/m-p/112606#M21182</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-06T08:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

