<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: fwaccel conns - Documentation issue in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110181#M20859</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is covered in the addendum to my book:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;p. 253: Correction: The F/f flags no longer appear in the output of &lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/STRONG&gt; starting&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;in version R80.30; if a connection is being handled in the F2F path it does not appear at&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;all in the output of &lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so commands such as &lt;STRONG&gt;fw ctl conntab&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;fw tab -u -t&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;connections -f&lt;/STRONG&gt; must be used to verify the presence of an F2F-handled connection.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So it would appear that the F/f flags (which haven't appeared since R80.30) have been reborn in R81 as indicating a fast_accel'ed connection.&amp;nbsp; The letter choice here is a bit unfortunate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-08T12:42:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>fwaccel conns - Documentation issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110069#M20848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have found a discrepancy between SK and the command "fwaccel conns" help. Here the option &lt;STRONG&gt;F/f&lt;/STRONG&gt; is described differently. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The SK &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk153832&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=SecureXL" target="_self"&gt;sk153832&lt;/A&gt; describes the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="SXL_issue1.JPG" style="width: 1000px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10480i20EE3EB3A7B8A48D/image-dimensions/1000x310?v=v2" width="1000" height="310" role="button" title="SXL_issue1.JPG" alt="SXL_issue1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The following is described in the command help in R81 "fwaccel conns -h":&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="SXL_issue2a.JPG" style="width: 671px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10482iDE2F00515E87381D/image-dimensions/671x282?v=v2" width="671" height="282" role="button" title="SXL_issue2a.JPG" alt="SXL_issue2a.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is right now "fast_accel" or "Forward to Firewall"?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110069#M20848</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-07T19:29:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fwaccel conns - Documentation issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110141#M20855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cannot find it in SK, please double-check. Anyhow, actual help if what you need to rely on&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110141#M20855</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-08T09:43:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fwaccel conns - Documentation issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110181#M20859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is covered in the addendum to my book:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;p. 253: Correction: The F/f flags no longer appear in the output of &lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/STRONG&gt; starting&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;in version R80.30; if a connection is being handled in the F2F path it does not appear at&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;all in the output of &lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so commands such as &lt;STRONG&gt;fw ctl conntab&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;fw tab -u -t&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;connections -f&lt;/STRONG&gt; must be used to verify the presence of an F2F-handled connection.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So it would appear that the F/f flags (which haven't appeared since R80.30) have been reborn in R81 as indicating a fast_accel'ed connection.&amp;nbsp; The letter choice here is a bit unfortunate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fwaccel-conns-Documentation-issue/m-p/110181#M20859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-08T12:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

