<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Changing mask for vIP of the clustered VTI interfaces in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109407#M20771</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not disagreeing that it can't be done that way (though a /30 wastes two addresses).&lt;BR /&gt;What does ifconfig for the interface say?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-01T07:18:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Changing mask for vIP of the clustered VTI interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109385#M20767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are trying to establish the communication with the peer that provided /30 network for the dynamic routing via VPN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As we have a cluster on our side, we have to create the vIP to assign the address specified by the peer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When "Get interfaces" is performed to ingest the VTIs, the mask that is assigned to the vIP is /32 and while the field for the mask looks like it is editable, we cannot change it to /30.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please suggest how this could be accomplished.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109385#M20767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-31T18:53:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing mask for vIP of the clustered VTI interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109396#M20769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Technically a VTI is a point-to-point interface.&lt;BR /&gt;That means it doesn't really have a subnet mask, but just a remote end.&lt;BR /&gt;That would suggest /32 is correct.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 03:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109396#M20769</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-01T03:17:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing mask for vIP of the clustered VTI interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109402#M20770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not really. Traditional P2P links were /30.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Take a look at this excerpt from Cisco:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Cisco VTI 30 Mask.png" style="width: 721px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10403i069C43C6E583C6A4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Cisco VTI 30 Mask.png" alt="Cisco VTI 30 Mask.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 03:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109402#M20770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-01T03:52:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing mask for vIP of the clustered VTI interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109407#M20771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not disagreeing that it can't be done that way (though a /30 wastes two addresses).&lt;BR /&gt;What does ifconfig for the interface say?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Changing-mask-for-vIP-of-the-clustered-VTI-interfaces/m-p/109407#M20771</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-01T07:18:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

