<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about connections table and cphwd_db table in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108836#M20712</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I came across this topic&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SecureXL-Connections-Table/td-p/16889," target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SecureXL-Connections-Table/td-p/16889,&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;Timothy_Hall had a comment :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"the connection is NATted there are four separate flows being tracked (c2s/outbound pre-NAT, c2s/outbound post-NAT, s2c/inbound pre-NAT, s2c/inbound post-NAT)."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This could answer my first question &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Equipe_reseau</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-26T08:43:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about connections table and cphwd_db table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108701#M20685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;BR /&gt;I have a small question about the proportion and some involved position of the connections located on connections table (fw tab -t connections)&lt;BR /&gt;If A(client) connects to B(server), it could be generated as follow:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;0, Client_IP, Client_Port, Server_IP, Server_Port, Protocol_Number&amp;gt; = Client side, inbound&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;1, Client_IP, Client_Port, Server_IP, Server_Port, Protocol_Number&amp;gt; = Server side, outbound&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;0, Server_IP, Server_Port, Client_IP, Client_Port, Protocol_Number&amp;gt; = Server side, inbound&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;1, Server_IP, Server_Port, Client_IP, Client_Port, Protocol_Number&amp;gt; = Client side, outbound&lt;BR /&gt;But If A is NATted (I called A+), what will we have?&lt;BR /&gt;As my investigation, the third entry will be changed :&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;0, Server_IP, Server_Port, A+, Client_Port, Protocol_Number&amp;gt; = Server side, inbound&lt;BR /&gt;Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So much confusion when looking at tables of checkpoint kernel :))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another thing,what is the format of table cphwd_db(fw tab -u -t cphwd_db).&lt;BR /&gt;I followed sk41618 which give a description:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;Source_IP, Source_Port, Dest_IP, Dest_Port, Proto; Bitmask_of_SecureXL_Flags, Pointer&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, the output is quite different :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;01010101,0000d80f, ,02020202,00000006; 0004000d, 00002aaa, ac697fb8, 00002aaa&amp;gt; ==&amp;gt; which one is Bitmask_of_SecureXL_Flags?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 04:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108701#M20685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Equipe_reseau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-25T04:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about connections table and cphwd_db table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108705#M20687</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I haven't looked at the connections table in detail in a while, but logically what you say makes sense.&lt;BR /&gt;The contents of cphwd_db are a bit different likely because the last time the SK was updated was...2014.&lt;BR /&gt;I recommend leaving feedback on the SK to ensure it gets updated.&lt;BR /&gt;Meanwhile, I'll "phone a friend." &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108705#M20687</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-25T05:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about connections table and cphwd_db table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108836#M20712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I came across this topic&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SecureXL-Connections-Table/td-p/16889," target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SecureXL-Connections-Table/td-p/16889,&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;Timothy_Hall had a comment :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"the connection is NATted there are four separate flows being tracked (c2s/outbound pre-NAT, c2s/outbound post-NAT, s2c/inbound pre-NAT, s2c/inbound post-NAT)."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This could answer my first question &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Question-about-connections-table-and-cphwd-db-table/m-p/108836#M20712</guid>
      <dc:creator>Equipe_reseau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-26T08:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

