<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Allowing ICMP Destination Unreachable Fragmentation Required in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allowing-ICMP-Destination-Unreachable-Fragmentation-Required/m-p/101555#M19719</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out how I let ICMP Type 3 Code 4 (Fragmentation Needed) packets back to the original sender that needs to reduce its MTU.&amp;nbsp; What's not clear to me is if these are allowed when ICMP stateful inspection is enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These ICMP packets do contain the original headers in the payload, if the FW is parsing down in to the payload, finding the original tcp/udp connection details, checking it's state table and dropping with "&lt;EM&gt;ICMP error does not match an existing connection"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;then I know the tcp/udp session is not on that same FW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Wes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 20:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WesEvernden</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-09T20:13:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing ICMP Destination Unreachable Fragmentation Required</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allowing-ICMP-Destination-Unreachable-Fragmentation-Required/m-p/101555#M19719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out how I let ICMP Type 3 Code 4 (Fragmentation Needed) packets back to the original sender that needs to reduce its MTU.&amp;nbsp; What's not clear to me is if these are allowed when ICMP stateful inspection is enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These ICMP packets do contain the original headers in the payload, if the FW is parsing down in to the payload, finding the original tcp/udp connection details, checking it's state table and dropping with "&lt;EM&gt;ICMP error does not match an existing connection"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;then I know the tcp/udp session is not on that same FW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Wes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 20:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allowing-ICMP-Destination-Unreachable-Fragmentation-Required/m-p/101555#M19719</guid>
      <dc:creator>WesEvernden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-09T20:13:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allowing ICMP Destination Unreachable Fragmentation Required</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allowing-ICMP-Destination-Unreachable-Fragmentation-Required/m-p/101564#M19722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Believe these are generally blocked without an explicit rule to enable them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 21:32:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allowing-ICMP-Destination-Unreachable-Fragmentation-Required/m-p/101564#M19722</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-09T21:32:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

