<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can a gateway be managed by SMS via IPv6 address? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97942#M19180</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The answer is: complicated.&lt;BR /&gt;Sync has never supported IPv6, though I would think with R80.40 and unicast sync this would be less complicated to implement now.&lt;BR /&gt;There are several legacy features that only support IPv4 (around legacy OPSEC APIs).&lt;BR /&gt;I believe most of the management/gateway configuration can happen over IPv6.&lt;BR /&gt;However, at best, the various components still require “dual stack” and cannot entirely operate in an IPv6 only environment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-30T16:15:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can a gateway be managed by SMS via IPv6 address?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97900#M19175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apparently a very basic question, but I am still confused after reading documentation and relevant SKs.&lt;BR /&gt;Can a gateway be managed by SMS via IPv6 address?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk39374" target="_self"&gt;sk39374&lt;/A&gt; states that it cannot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Can I have a Security Gateway that only runs IPv6?
Starting from R76, it is possible to operate a Security Gateway (regular or VS mode) entirely with IPv6, except of one IPv4 address on the interface used for management.&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;At the same time, the SK doesn't include information that Sync interface cannot have IPv6 address defined (as per &lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-CXLG/ClusterXL-Requirements-and-Compatibility.htm?Highlight=ipv6#IPv6_Support_for_ClusterXL" target="_self"&gt;IPv6_Support_for_ClusterXL&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk160753&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=All" target="_self"&gt;sk160753&lt;/A&gt; tells the following:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;01622840,&lt;BR /&gt;PMTR-47313&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;IPv6 addresses for management interface are not supported on R80.x Security Management Server.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this statement can be interpreted in a few ways:&lt;BR /&gt;1. It's talking about the Mgmt physical interface on the SMS&lt;BR /&gt;2. It's talking about physical Mgmt interfaces on gateways to SMS&lt;BR /&gt;3. It's talking about interfaces that are assigned as management (set management interface ...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And also I see that Smart Console actually allows you to configure IPv6 address as main gateway IP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did anyone experiment with this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97900#M19175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maria_Pologova</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T10:58:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can a gateway be managed by SMS via IPv6 address?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97917#M19179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the internal net you would go with non-routable IPv4 for GW to SMS. Sync is another topic, but if in doubt and really need such a config, ask TAC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97917#M19179</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T13:42:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can a gateway be managed by SMS via IPv6 address?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97942#M19180</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The answer is: complicated.&lt;BR /&gt;Sync has never supported IPv6, though I would think with R80.40 and unicast sync this would be less complicated to implement now.&lt;BR /&gt;There are several legacy features that only support IPv4 (around legacy OPSEC APIs).&lt;BR /&gt;I believe most of the management/gateway configuration can happen over IPv6.&lt;BR /&gt;However, at best, the various components still require “dual stack” and cannot entirely operate in an IPv6 only environment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Can-a-gateway-be-managed-by-SMS-via-IPv6-address/m-p/97942#M19180</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T16:15:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

