<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New Tool: CPPCAP in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12086#M1900</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to upload a bunch of core dumps of the cppcap daemon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure what triggered them. I just noticed them when I did investigated something else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hugo_vd_Kooij</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-10T09:52:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12069#M1883</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCPDUMP is a Linux tool which at times is not suitable for use with Gaia.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, it can use a noticeable amount of CPU.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check Point created a tool which works better with Gaia OS: CPPCAP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'CPPCAP' is a traffic capture tool which provides the most relevant outputs and is similar to Tcpdump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The tool is adjusted to Gaia operating system yet requires installation of an applicable RPM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can download this tool for R77.30, R80.10, and R80.20 and get more details here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk141412" title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk141412"&gt;Running TCPDUMP causes high CPU usage&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12069#M1883</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T18:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12070#M1884</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/2075"&gt;Dameon&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Must SecureXL disabeld (fwaccel off) to use this tool with R80.20?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And how‘s that with R80.10 and R77.30?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Heiko&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12070#M1884</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T19:02:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12071#M1885</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will this eventually be released to install via CPUSE?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** EDIT ***&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to add, I see the&amp;nbsp;CPUSE Identifier in the SK, the question is about the publish of this update in CPUSE without having to use the identifier, just like other Recommended updates.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12071#M1885</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike_A</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T19:21:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12072#M1886</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not that I know of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12072#M1886</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T20:35:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12073#M1887</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume we will push it as a recommended update after we get some good feedback &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:36:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12073#M1887</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T20:36:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12074#M1888</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One positive thing I've seen so far is the file size being included, not just the number of packets captured!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-bash-3.1# cppcap -DNT host 10.0.10.79 -o /var/tmp/mike.pcap&lt;BR /&gt;934 packets captured (75.719 KB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12074#M1888</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike_A</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T21:04:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12075#M1889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/9013-tool-httpstcpdump101com" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/9013-tool-httpstcpdump101com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cc &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/61990" target="_blank"&gt;Sean Murray-Ford&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12075#M1889</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozkoMrkvicka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:02:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12076#M1890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://i.imgflip.com/2nyaga.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for tagging this for me, &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/42431"&gt;Jozko Mrkvicka&lt;/A&gt;‌ Looks like it's time to play around and add a new module. &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt; I'll get this going through the week (hopefully) and update the tcpdump101.com thread once it's done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 04:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12076#M1890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Grave_Rose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-02T04:08:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12077#M1891</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/55229"&gt;Heiko Ankenbrand&lt;/A&gt;‌, SecureXL can be enabled or disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 06:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12077#M1891</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aviad_Hadarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-02T06:44:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12078#M1892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it planned to be pre-installed on newer version of ISO images ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 07:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12078#M1892</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin_Valenta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T07:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12079#M1893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like a nice tool... But its only for gateways that use a 64-bit Kernel...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unsupported kernel version (Only 64-bit is supported)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe this is worth mentioning in the discussion / SK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jelle&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12079#M1893</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Jelle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T08:28:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12080#M1894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will ask the SK team to add this to the limitations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I would think 32-bit is rare at this point as 64bit is required to run with more than 4-6GB of RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:49:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12080#M1894</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T15:49:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12081#M1895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've added the 'cppcap' module to &lt;A href="https://tcpdump101.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://tcpdump101.com&lt;/A&gt; and updated the main Check Mates thread here &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/9013-tool-httpstcpdump101com" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/9013-tool-httpstcpdump101com&lt;/A&gt; for anyone who wants to discuss more. &lt;IMG id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12081#M1895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Grave_Rose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:02:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12082#M1896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently trying cppcap out on R80.10 JHF Take 167. I see only "Out" in my packet capture when SecureXL is turned off. When SecureXL is enabled I only see "In". So on pre-R80.20 machines the advise seems to be to turn off SecureXL when using cppcap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12082#M1896</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickHoppe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-05T13:44:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12083#M1897</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've always used fw monitor over tcpdump.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What exactly does this new tool, or tcpdump get you over fw monitor?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12083#M1897</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_Canis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-06T20:06:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12084#M1898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A couple of benefits:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You can actually save the packet captures&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You can see traffic that doesn't traverse the firewall (i.e. broadcast or ARP traffic)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12084#M1898</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-06T21:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12085#M1899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can save fw monitor captures with the -o option, so now we're down to just seeing broadcast traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 12:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12085#M1899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_Canis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-07T12:56:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12086#M1900</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to upload a bunch of core dumps of the cppcap daemon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure what triggered them. I just noticed them when I did investigated something else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12086#M1900</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hugo_vd_Kooij</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T09:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12087#M1901</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also ask them to fix the syntax error in the example ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;cppcap –f "arp and host XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" -DNT –o /var/log/capture.pcap&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dash before the first 'f' and 'o'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit: the text contains the dash, though on screen it is invisible (at least in Safari).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12087#M1901</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harald_Hansen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-11T08:53:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Tool: CPPCAP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12088#M1902</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Received notification from SK team that SK has been modified: "&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;The tool is supported only on 64 bit OS."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/New-Tool-CPPCAP/m-p/12088#M1902</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean_Van_Loon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-11T09:49:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

