<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover between 2 datacenters? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87811#M17693</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" style="width: 1440px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6418i4E7698C702FCC70E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" alt="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi if you look at pg 36 of cluster_xl admin guide for R80.10 (we are using R80.20 by the way) you can see some points related to distribution of clusters over a wide geographical network (which is what it would be for clusters between 2 datacenters) but I do not see any mention related to bgp issues, etc or the issues that you are referring to(it does mention that only layer 2 should be involved between cluster interfaces), or maybe I'm not reading properly? Maybe it's mentioned somewhere else? Please do tell, if it's not a viable solution then we will not go for it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 23:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-09T23:38:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87803#M17688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure failover between two datacenters , right now we have one cluster in one data center(which are our internet firewalls) and planning to add another cluster in the second datacenter, now how do we achieve a failover? Can it be achieved if we add the second cluster in the second datacenter to the existing cluster? And if not what solution would work for a proper failover between 2 datacenters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87803#M17688</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-09T22:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87808#M17692</link>
      <description>Failing over between sites almost always means dynamic routing is involved.&lt;BR /&gt;Also, unless you are using provider-independent IP space, you generally cannot do any sort of failover gracefully as the IPs will have to change when you switch sites. &lt;BR /&gt;Even then, you may still have issues as BGP updates on the Internet.&lt;BR /&gt;None of this involves clustering the gateways at each site together.&lt;BR /&gt;Also, clusters have to share the same L2 networks, which they often don't in a cross-site failure.&lt;BR /&gt;However, we do support cross-site clustering with different L2 domains in R80.40.&lt;BR /&gt;It doesn't solve any of the above issues, though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, if you do want active/active clustering that works across sites, you need to be in R80.40 &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 23:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87808#M17692</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-09T23:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87811#M17693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" style="width: 1440px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6418i4E7698C702FCC70E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" alt="Screenshot_20200609-173447_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi if you look at pg 36 of cluster_xl admin guide for R80.10 (we are using R80.20 by the way) you can see some points related to distribution of clusters over a wide geographical network (which is what it would be for clusters between 2 datacenters) but I do not see any mention related to bgp issues, etc or the issues that you are referring to(it does mention that only layer 2 should be involved between cluster interfaces), or maybe I'm not reading properly? Maybe it's mentioned somewhere else? Please do tell, if it's not a viable solution then we will not go for it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 23:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87811#M17693</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-09T23:38:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87812#M17694</link>
      <description>However I do get your point regarding bgp issues, changing of ips, etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 23:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87812#M17694</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-09T23:40:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87815#M17695</link>
      <description>Cluster members have to have Layer 2 connectivity on all interfaces prior to R80.40.&lt;BR /&gt;That implies the same subnets are available at each site as well, including external networks.&lt;BR /&gt;For external-facing addresses, this usually means provider-independent IP addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;The routing of that between sites has to be changed through dynamic routing.&lt;BR /&gt;Likewise, depending on how your internal network is set up, you may need dynamic routing for a failover to occur cross-site as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bottom line: you need to understand how the rest of your network can react to this.&lt;BR /&gt;Cross-site clusters can be helpful (subject to limitations) but it requires things elsewhere in the network as well.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87815#M17695</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T00:50:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between 2 datacenters?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87820#M17696</link>
      <description>Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Failover-between-2-datacenters/m-p/87820#M17696</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T03:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

