<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85712#M17213</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;VPN should not cause noticeable overhead for something like Skype unless your firewall is overloaded or needs some tuning.&amp;nbsp; Post the "Super Seven" (s7pac) command outputs for further analysis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However are you seeing persistent high CPU utilization on only one of your SND cores?&amp;nbsp; There was a thread awhile back about a bug that could cause all remote access VPN traffic to bottleneck in a single SND core.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hide NAT shouldn't directly degrade the performance of Skype either, typically protocols either work with Hide NAT or they don't.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 21:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-18T21:13:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85697#M17210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp; Mates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently experiencing poor call quality when using our on-premise sype for business. We are in the process of finding the possible reasons for that, and as always it comes to the firewalls guys.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of our users are working remotely, so they tend to use skype when connected to to VPN, there are two things that I need help with:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Does remote access VPN creates a significant impact on voip services(in this case skype calls)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Since we are doing Hide NAT on the office mode pool, does Hide-NAT have any impact on that too?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other recomendation is welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using R80.20, we do not have https inspection enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 17:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85697#M17210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-18T17:48:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85712#M17213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;VPN should not cause noticeable overhead for something like Skype unless your firewall is overloaded or needs some tuning.&amp;nbsp; Post the "Super Seven" (s7pac) command outputs for further analysis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However are you seeing persistent high CPU utilization on only one of your SND cores?&amp;nbsp; There was a thread awhile back about a bug that could cause all remote access VPN traffic to bottleneck in a single SND core.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hide NAT shouldn't directly degrade the performance of Skype either, typically protocols either work with Hide NAT or they don't.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 21:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85712#M17213</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-18T21:13:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85729#M17215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Allow outbound STUN (UDP/3478-3481) and everything will be fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85729#M17215</guid>
      <dc:creator>HristoGrigorov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T03:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85745#M17217</link>
      <description>Hi Hristo&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you elaborate more on that? My vpn access rule for corporate users is set to "Any".&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 08:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85745#M17217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T08:27:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85747#M17218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If it set to Any then it must be something else.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 08:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85747#M17218</guid>
      <dc:creator>HristoGrigorov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T08:35:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85748#M17219</link>
      <description>Hi Tim&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your feeback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The firewall itself does not have any performance issue, and there is no single SND core with high CPU utilization. The traffic is being distributed accordingly among the cores&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 08:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85748#M17219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T08:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hide NAT impact on skype for business</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85749#M17220</link>
      <description>Yes, I wanted to validate what else I could look for on the firewall side. I was thinking maybe the VPN and Hide NAT could have an influence on this behavior.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 08:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Hide-NAT-impact-on-skype-for-business/m-p/85749#M17220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T08:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

