<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Azure fabric IP's as application/category in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11260#M1685</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked with R&amp;amp;D, having the Azure IPs available as a dynamic object is part of the plans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the current EA does not include it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-14T17:21:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Azure fabric IP's as application/category</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11257#M1682</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have IaaS configured in Azure public cloud. We need to bypass https inspection for Windows servers reaching Azure fabric. I am wondering how can I create that rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandru&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11257#M1682</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chandhrasekar_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-13T17:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Azure fabric IP's as application/category</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11258#M1683</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moving this to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/space/2030"&gt;General Product Topics&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;since this not specific to vSEC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if we had an Application Control category, you can't use Application Categories in the HTTPS Inspection rulebase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your specific use case, is it to reach ANYTHING in the Azure fabric or specific applications?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If just specific applications, then you can just put the specific IPs in as destinations in your HTTPS Inspection rulebase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're talking about anything in Azure in general, we don't have a ready-made solution today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said there is functionality under development to support automatically updating dynamic objects for the purposes of using them in things like the HTTPS Inspection policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now this functionality is focused on Office 365, though I suppose it could be extended to Azure easily enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's available as an Early Availability fix on top of R80.10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're interested, I recommend reaching out to your local Check Point SE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11258#M1683</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-13T23:33:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Azure fabric IP's as application/category</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11259#M1684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dameon. My use case is to reach all of 'Azure' fabric not just specific applications&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will check with my SE to see if the office 365 object can be extended to whole of Azure as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11259#M1684</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chandhrasekar_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-14T15:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Azure fabric IP's as application/category</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11260#M1685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked with R&amp;amp;D, having the Azure IPs available as a dynamic object is part of the plans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the current EA does not include it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11260#M1685</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-14T17:21:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Azure fabric IP's as application/category</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11261#M1686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update Dameon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Azure-fabric-IP-s-as-application-category/m-p/11261#M1686</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chandhrasekar_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-14T17:50:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

