<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP service level Agreement in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/76504#M15536</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now in R80.30 it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to add a ping monitoring in the options "Advanced Routing -&amp;gt; IP Reachability detection -&amp;gt; Static Sessions" , then you enter the Ip address and the type of session as "Ping".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then you can add in the static route the ping option with the monitor you added.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this will work for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris100500</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-26T21:55:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11332#M1706</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi tell me exists in checkpoint&amp;nbsp;IP Service Level Agreement - service-analog for cisco IP SLA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe in the interpretation of the checkpoint, it is called differently?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P/S There is a task to check the quality of the channel of the provider&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;of the means by which checkpoint I'll be able to do it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11332#M1706</guid>
      <dc:creator>b5ff9cad-669e-4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T12:14:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11333#M1707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Usually there are only technical questions discussed here -&amp;nbsp;this sounds like a question for your local CP SE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11333#M1707</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T13:16:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11334#M1708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;It’s long ago I worked directly with Cisco routers but IP SLA is definitely a technical feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;I think the only analogy on Check Point is the „ping gateway“ feature to take routes offline if the next hop is not pingable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11334#M1708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T14:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11335#M1709</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oh, that is quite a relevation - i would otherwise never have thought of&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Service Level Agreement as a technical feature &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:46:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11335#M1709</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T14:46:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11336#M1710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see&amp;nbsp;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="link-titled" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/message/25136-re-pbr-with-multiple-tracking?commentID=25136#comment-25136" title="https://community.checkpoint.com/message/25136-re-pbr-with-multiple-tracking?commentID=25136#comment-25136"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/message/25136-re-pbr-with-multiple-tracking?commentID=25136#comment-25136&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; for the post by &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/41625"&gt;Timothy Hall&lt;/A&gt;‌:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;A little-known feature of ClusterXL may be able to help here; ClusterXL can be configured to test connectivity to upstream IP addresses with ping, and initiate a failover based on loss of reachability to the pinged hosts.&amp;nbsp; There could be a very different Gaia PBR configuration on the standby member that takes over as a result.&amp;nbsp; See:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk35780&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL%22" title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk35780&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL%22"&gt;How to configure $FWDIR/bin/clusterXL_monitor_ips script to run automatically on Gaia / SecurePlatform OS&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/11336#M1710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T18:27:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP service level Agreement</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/76504#M15536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now in R80.30 it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to add a ping monitoring in the options "Advanced Routing -&amp;gt; IP Reachability detection -&amp;gt; Static Sessions" , then you enter the Ip address and the type of session as "Ping".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then you can add in the static route the ping option with the monitor you added.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this will work for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/IP-service-level-Agreement/m-p/76504#M15536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris100500</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T21:55:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

