<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75769#M15366</link>
    <description>bond0 UP sync(secured), multicast, bond High Availability&lt;BR /&gt;eth2 DOWN (2.94402e+06 secs)non sync(non secured), multicast (eth2.513 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth1 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth1.104 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth1 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth1.2 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth2 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth2.913 )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and there is no way just to exclude eth2 from this?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:28:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75746#M15355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So i have a problem, i have 7ish ClusterXL sites.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and when i try to preform a migration on my ISP they get a loop from my Firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after i tracked it i see this problem on every ClusterXL site.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They all have the same MAC Address&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;0000.0000.0100 dynamic ip,ipx,assigned,other TenGigabitEthernet2/1/4&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;0000.0000.0101 dynamic ip,ipx,assigned,other TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000.0000.0100 DYNAMIC Gi0/20&lt;BR /&gt;0000.0000.0101 DYNAMIC Gi0/43&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone knows how to disabel this fake address ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75746#M15355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T14:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75753#M15358</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You do not want to disable those "fake" MAC addresses, because they represent in fact ClusterID&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CCP uses artificial MAC to send ClusterXL probing and status exchange communications. Those MACs are used to identify multiple members of the same cluster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are not used to carry any production traffic. For more details, refer to ClusterXL ATRG:&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk93306" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk93306&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or attend CCSE courses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75753#M15358</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T14:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75754#M15359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;However, if you have multiple ClusterXL cluster in the same broadcast domains, having default Cluster ID is problematic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Look here for resolution:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk25977" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk25977&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75754#M15359</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T14:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75755#M15360</link>
      <description>well i want to limit them on specific interface, that connects to my WAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will have a look at the Link Val!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:40:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75755#M15360</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T14:40:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75763#M15361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unless you have connectivity issues on WAN router, there is not harm. If you do, look at ATRG to find a workaround.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:00:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75763#M15361</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:00:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75764#M15362</link>
      <description>The ISP sees the MAC 0000.0000.0101 for example coming in from two diffrent ports.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And there Anti Loop trigers shuting down my WAN. so there is a issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Most of all i just want to exclude the CCP from my WAN interfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75764#M15362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75766#M15363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Disable IGMP snooping on the ports that are making issues. All cluster members are using the same "Magic macs" as ID for CCP communications.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is another reference for you for that matter:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33221" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33221&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75766#M15363</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75767#M15364</link>
      <description>Will the "Fake" Mac address stop if i turn it over to broadcast?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75767#M15364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:21:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75768#M15365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is also an option, but you will be flooding your segment with CCP broadcast packets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75768#M15365</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:25:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75769#M15366</link>
      <description>bond0 UP sync(secured), multicast, bond High Availability&lt;BR /&gt;eth2 DOWN (2.94402e+06 secs)non sync(non secured), multicast (eth2.513 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth1 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth1.104 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth1 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth1.2 )&lt;BR /&gt;eth2 UP non sync(non secured), multicast (eth2.913 )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and there is no way just to exclude eth2 from this?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75769#M15366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T15:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75781#M15367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is a global parameter, no way to switch more per interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75781#M15367</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T17:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAC Address 0000.0000.0101 and 0000.0000.0100</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75830#M15377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Val for the help!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will implement the broadcast and test that,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am runing a 80.20 already on that way (80.10 on the rest of my clusters)&amp;nbsp; and it seems that 80.20 broad is preferd already.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so it might be a non issue when upgrading.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 06:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/MAC-Address-0000-0000-0101-and-0000-0000-0100/m-p/75830#M15377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Niklas_Davidsso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-20T06:31:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

