<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balancing for IPSEC VPN Tunnels in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Load-Balancing-for-IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels/m-p/72927#M14804</link>
    <description>VTI's and dynamic routing is the only way. to run active-active tunnels.&lt;BR /&gt;That way you can direct traffic from site1 to DC1 through the tunnel to DC1 and traffic for DC2 through the other tunnel to DC2. So you have 2 tunnels from each location to the DC's, when either of the 2 will fail, Dynamic routing should reroute traffic from site1 to DC1 over DC2.&lt;BR /&gt;Presuming you have a direct connection between the DC's</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-21T22:36:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing for IPSEC VPN Tunnels</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Load-Balancing-for-IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels/m-p/72915#M14798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're looking to implement Active/Active or Active/Standby VPN tunnels from our client (two locations) to our data centers (two locations). Would like to see if there is a way to create global load balancer (or something similar) to be able to manage (manually or automatically) what data center the traffic will go to.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea will be appreciated &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Load-Balancing-for-IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels/m-p/72915#M14798</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shurik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-21T20:29:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing for IPSEC VPN Tunnels</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Load-Balancing-for-IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels/m-p/72927#M14804</link>
      <description>VTI's and dynamic routing is the only way. to run active-active tunnels.&lt;BR /&gt;That way you can direct traffic from site1 to DC1 through the tunnel to DC1 and traffic for DC2 through the other tunnel to DC2. So you have 2 tunnels from each location to the DC's, when either of the 2 will fail, Dynamic routing should reroute traffic from site1 to DC1 over DC2.&lt;BR /&gt;Presuming you have a direct connection between the DC's</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Load-Balancing-for-IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels/m-p/72927#M14804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-21T22:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

