<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Allocate secondary IP block on physical interface while using VRRP cluster in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allocate-secondary-IP-block-on-physical-interface-while-using/m-p/69796#M14167</link>
    <description>Regardless of the clustering mechanism, it is not supported to have multiple subnets configured on the same physical interface. &lt;BR /&gt;It's also not considered best practice.&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe these IPs could be assigned on the loopback interface?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-09T18:05:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allocate secondary IP block on physical interface while using VRRP cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allocate-secondary-IP-block-on-physical-interface-while-using/m-p/69343#M14101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to establish a BGP peering session straight from the external Firewall interface into the Microsoft Edge Routers to establish both a Private and a Microsoft peering session. MS peering requires you to allocate public IP's for this peering to work whilst the Private peering would work with just Private IP addressing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to allocate different IP blocks into the same physical interface for this purpose?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each MS peering session requires you to allocate a /30 subnet, so the idea would be to allocate two larger /27 IP blocks (one for Private and one for Public) and break these down into individual, smaller /30 subnets for each of the peering sessions that need to be established (I need 4 private peering sessions and 4 public ones).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We will be using the FWs in VRRP cluster mode since I believe Cluster XL wouldn't allow you to have separe virtual IP subnets off the same physical interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 16:11:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allocate-secondary-IP-block-on-physical-interface-while-using/m-p/69343#M14101</guid>
      <dc:creator>paviflo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-04T16:11:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allocate secondary IP block on physical interface while using VRRP cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allocate-secondary-IP-block-on-physical-interface-while-using/m-p/69796#M14167</link>
      <description>Regardless of the clustering mechanism, it is not supported to have multiple subnets configured on the same physical interface. &lt;BR /&gt;It's also not considered best practice.&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe these IPs could be assigned on the loopback interface?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Allocate-secondary-IP-block-on-physical-interface-while-using/m-p/69796#M14167</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T18:05:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

