<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.10 configuration HA in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63904#M12967</link>
    <description>Thank you very much</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-29T03:18:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.10 configuration HA</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63777#M12943</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi，&lt;SPAN&gt;Distinguished engineers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Firewall HA, when preparing to use two heartbeats, the best practice is to configure two heartbeats as Bond or two separate heartbeats？&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63777#M12943</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T04:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.10 configuration HA</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63834#M12954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have always done it as a bond set in 802.3ad mode on the Check Point side with the links spread across either two stacked Cisco Catalyst switches or two Nexus Switches running VPC in Port-channels on the Cisco side.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63834#M12954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Taney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T13:37:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.10 configuration HA</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63844#M12959</link>
      <description>Using a bond is considered best practice these days.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63844#M12959</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T15:22:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.10 configuration HA</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63845#M12960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An interface bond is the only supported way of sync redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92804" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL -&amp;nbsp;sk92804&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63845#M12960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T15:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.10 configuration HA</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63904#M12967</link>
      <description>Thank you very much</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-10-configuration-HA/m-p/63904#M12967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-29T03:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

