<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic fw monitor and cppcap on VSX R80.20 (JHF 91) in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63258#M12828</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I just want to share my findings on fw monitor and cppcap on a VSX R80.20 JHF 91 environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;fw monitor just segfaults if I use the -v &amp;lt;VSID&amp;gt; switch&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;fw monitor just ignores the VS context if running without -v switch and captures packets in all VS&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;cppcap does not work in VSX R80.20 JHF 91 with acceleration enabled, I had to do a fwaccel off in the specific VS to capture traffic&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may be wrong. But if not, some documents should be corrected, including Heiko's excellent cheat sheet...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-20T13:27:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>fw monitor and cppcap on VSX R80.20 (JHF 91)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63258#M12828</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just want to share my findings on fw monitor and cppcap on a VSX R80.20 JHF 91 environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;fw monitor just segfaults if I use the -v &amp;lt;VSID&amp;gt; switch&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;fw monitor just ignores the VS context if running without -v switch and captures packets in all VS&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;cppcap does not work in VSX R80.20 JHF 91 with acceleration enabled, I had to do a fwaccel off in the specific VS to capture traffic&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may be wrong. But if not, some documents should be corrected, including Heiko's excellent cheat sheet...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63258#M12828</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-20T13:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fw monitor and cppcap on VSX R80.20 (JHF 91)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63358#M12846</link>
      <description>The first and third issues might be worth TAC cases.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 16:01:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63358#M12846</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-22T16:01:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fw monitor and cppcap on VSX R80.20 (JHF 91)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63363#M12849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15932"&gt;@dj0Nz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, this is all known. See..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Documented in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk162402&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=VSX%22" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk162402&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Documented in&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk159152&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=Security" target="_self"&gt;sk159152&lt;/A&gt;, either use the -F switch with &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk30583#Capture%20Examples%20-%20F" target="_self"&gt;simple capture syntax&lt;/A&gt; or disable SecureXL (&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk104468" target="_self"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;for specific IPs if you like&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;) before using -e&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Documented &lt;A href="https://checkpoint.engineer/tools/cppcap-alternative-for-tcpdump/" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63363#M12849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-22T19:18:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fw monitor and cppcap on VSX R80.20 (JHF 91)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63377#M12853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would have helped a lot ... if sk162402 has been released earlier. Concerning the third topic: I would expect Check Point to include this in the official documentation, when it's certain that cppcap won't work with acceleration on.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, again, thank you for clarifying!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:54:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/fw-monitor-and-cppcap-on-VSX-R80-20-JHF-91/m-p/63377#M12853</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-23T06:54:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

