<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/62021#M12596</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's an interesting question. I would prefer a manual configuration if I didn't know how it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 05:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tsvika_Gilman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-06T05:53:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61768#M12510</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Helvetica Neue', 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;An extract from the readme with information about R80.40:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CUT&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CoreXL and Multi-Queue&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Support for automatic allocation of CoreXL SNDs and Firewall instances that does not require a Security Gateway reboot.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Improved out of the box experience - Security Gateway &lt;SPAN style="color: #ef6950;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs and Firewall instances&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ef6950;"&gt;and the Multi-Queue&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; configuration based on the current traffic load&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;CUT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you have any information on how the algorithms will work? &lt;BR /&gt;According to which criteria will the distribution take place?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How will this work with a ClusterXL?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61768#M12510</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T15:26:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61772#M12513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great questions Heiko, I'm assuming this is all predicated on the new Gaia 3.10 kernel and USFW being enabled in R80.40...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61772#M12513</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T15:29:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61973#M12581</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any news here from Check Point?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 19:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/61973#M12581</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-05T19:12:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/62021#M12596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's an interesting question. I would prefer a manual configuration if I didn't know how it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 05:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/62021#M12596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tsvika_Gilman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T05:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 automatically changes the number of CoreXL SNDs, Firewall instances and the Multi-Queue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/62325#M12647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Heiko,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Addressing your question per algorithm concept:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Essence&lt;/U&gt;:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Changing CoreXL split between FW workers and SND on the fly based on CPU utilization&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Deciding keys:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The average utilization of CoreXL SNDs and FWs are regularly sampled&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If either CoreXL SNDs or FWs utilization is higher than the other, perform an estimate of utilization post “migrating” a CPU to the other group&lt;BR /&gt;Note: when SMT is on, change is doubled&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Flows:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If more SNDs are needed
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Find least utilized CoreXL FW instance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Stop dispatching new connections to the least utilized CoreXL FW instance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Move the CoreXL FW instance to the CPU of next least utilized CoreXL FW instance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Turn on a new MQ queue on the “evicted” CPU&lt;BR /&gt;Note: Eligible CoreXL SNDs must have a MQ queue ready&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;OL start="2"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If more FWs are needed
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Choose the last “stopped” CoreXL FW instance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Turn off MQ queue from the CPU it originally occupied&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Move the chosen CoreXL FW instance to the original CPU it occupied&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Start dispatching new connections to that CoreXL FW instance&lt;BR /&gt;Note: No more than the maximum number of FWs can be added&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;General &lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Supported on OS 3.10 (USFW/Kernel); Check Point appliances with 8 cores or more; VSX is currently a limitation&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Supported on Cluster HA; VSLS is currently a limitation&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For&amp;nbsp; further questions / feedback / suggestions for enhancements etc. – pls don’t hesitate to contact me directly - chenmu@checkpoint.com&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-40-automatically-changes-the-number-of-CoreXL-SNDs-Firewall/m-p/62325#M12647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chen_Muchtar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T20:15:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

