topic Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow) in General Topics

Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:20:38 GMT

Chapter

More interesting articles:

- R80.x Architecture and Performance Tuning - Link Collection
- Article list (Heiko Ankenbrand)

Flowchart news in R80.20 and above

SecureXL has been significantly revised in R80.20. This has also led to some changes in "fw monitor". There are new fw monitor chain (SecureXL) objects that do not run in the virtual machine.

Now SecureXL works in part in user space. The SecureXL driver takes a certain amount of kernel memory per core and that was adding up to more kernel memory than Intel/Linux was allowing. The packet flow in R80.20+ is a little bit different from the flow lower than R80.20. Now it is possible to use async SecureXL and other new functions. This figure shows the new features with the reinjection of SecureXL packages. SecureXL supportes now also Async SecureXL with Falcon cards. That's new in acceleration high level architecture (SecureXL on Acceleration Card): Streaming over SecureXL, Lite Parsers, Scalable SecureXL, Acceleration stickiness...

More informations here: R80.x Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Whats new in R80.20+:

Now there are several SecureXL instances possible. As a result, packets are reinjected with the new SecureXL ID into the correct SecureXL instance again after they have been allowed by access template or rule set. After the packet has been reinjected, the SecureXL ID is added to the SecureXL connetion table and the packet is forwarded to the correct SecureXL instance. Therefore the flow is slightly different to older version before R80.20. This new mechanism also offers the possibility to transfer packets into a new SecureXL instance on Falcon cards.

PXL vs. PSLXL - Technology name for combination of SecureXL and PSL. PXL was renamed to PSLXL in R80.20. This is from my point of view the politically correct better term.

For the new acceleration Falcon card architecture with R80.20+ and SecureXL offloading read this article:

R80.x Security Gateway Architecture (Acceleration Card Offloading):

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

PhoneBoy — Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:39:30 GMT

"fort he" typo in the middle of the diagram.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:42:31 GMT

THX @PhoneBoy,

I'll change tomorrow in the next version.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Daniel_Hainich — Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:17:26 GMT

there is also "thw" in top securexl matching.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Ziv_Zander — Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:33:04 GMT

Typos aren't a problem. The content is important.

And I think that is brilliant information from @HeikoAnkenbrand.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:08:43 GMT

Hi @PhoneBoy, Hi @Daniel_Hainich

THX is changed.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:12:52 GMT

I also added the paths (Slow Path, Medium Path and Fast Path) marked in color.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:49:11 GMT

Now there are several SecureXL instances possible. As a result, packets are reinjected with the new SecureXL ID into the correct SecureXL instance again after they have been allowed by access template or rule set. After the packet has been reinjected, the SecureXL ID is added to the SecureXL connettion table and the packet is forwarded to the correct SecureXL instance. Therefore the flow is slightly different to older version before R80.20. This new mechanism also offers the possibility to transfer packets into a new SecureXL instance on Falcon cards.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

F__Rahama — Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:40:07 GMT

Why packets reinjection with the neu SecureXL ID into the correct SecureXl instance is needed?

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Timothy_Hall — Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:56:16 GMT

Starting in R80.20 there can be more than one instance of SecureXL present on the gateway, but the only way you can have this situation is if a Falcon card is present (which is essentially another instance of SecureXL running on the card itself). If a packet is received by the "wrong" instance of SecureXL on a gateway, it is forwarded to the correct instance and the packet is counted as a "correction" in the output of commands like fwaccel stats -s.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:52:39 GMT

Yes @Timothy_Hall describes this well, from R80.20 there are correction flows. They forward the packet to the correct SecureXL instance.

Through reinjection, the packet is tagged with the correct SecureXL ID and then forwarded to the appropriate SecureXL instance. This is now also described in the new R80.30 document Performance Tuning R80.30 Administration Guide.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

HeikoAnkenbrand — Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:24:29 GMT

Here is a picture from a LAB appliance with corrected packet flow:

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

James_Heueck — Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:56:46 GMT

Great info.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Bidwell_Britta — Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:51:03 GMT

Nice update.

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Vitaly_C_ — Thu, 05 Sep 2019 19:06:51 GMT

😀

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

Tsvika_Gilman — Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:42:42 GMT

Nice informaton update!

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

R2D2 — Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:12:48 GMT

Is this CCSE exam relevant?

Re: Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)

_Val_ — Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:35:09 GMT

Technically speaking, no. However, this helps with understanding of technology. That said, I advise you to stick with official documentation and course textbooks for certification