<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R77.30 Build-10 ISO image in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59576#M12039</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Maarten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your inputs, hope I should be using "&lt;SPAN&gt;Check_Point_R77.30_3000_5000_15000_23000_Sandblast_Appliances_T22.iso" &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;or &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;same Take_10 which I found "Check_Point_R77.30_3000_5000_15000_23000_Sandblast_Appliances_T10.iso".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards, Prabu&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 13:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-04T13:05:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R77.30 Build-10 ISO image</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59295#M11967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have Clusters in R77.30 Gaia 5000 appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One member was not working and need to rebuild.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In working Member we have R77.30 Build Take-10 ISO image as below (few years back)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Product version Check Point Gaia R77.30&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;OS build 10&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;OS kernel version 2.6.18-92cpx86_64&lt;BR /&gt;OS edition 64-bit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I could not find this OS Build ISO image of R77.30.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will building New member with Latest R77.30 ISO cause any issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I will be installing JHF_Take_317 as well in both so that the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I had encountered some issues if ISO take is different in Cluster members eventhough JHF remains same)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions will be helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Prabulingam.N&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59295#M11967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T03:24:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R77.30 Build-10 ISO image</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59307#M11970</link>
      <description>There should be no problem when you do a clean install with the latest ISO and on top of that install 317. The only difference between the builds is that there is a Jumbo integrated already and the epoch date issues have been resolved.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 06:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59307#M11970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T06:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R77.30 Build-10 ISO image</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59576#M12039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Maarten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your inputs, hope I should be using "&lt;SPAN&gt;Check_Point_R77.30_3000_5000_15000_23000_Sandblast_Appliances_T22.iso" &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;or &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;same Take_10 which I found "Check_Point_R77.30_3000_5000_15000_23000_Sandblast_Appliances_T10.iso".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards, Prabu&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 13:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59576#M12039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-04T13:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R77.30 Build-10 ISO image</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59578#M12040</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why R77.30? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;R77.30 is out of support in September.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 17:39:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59578#M12040</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-04T17:39:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R77.30 Build-10 ISO image</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59605#M12046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Heiko,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since only 1 cluster member is Active currently, before something goes wrong I wanted to get other member back quickly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then customer will plan for R80.x later.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Prabu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 05:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R77-30-Build-10-ISO-image/m-p/59605#M12046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-05T05:04:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

