<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56638#M11405</link>
    <description>It will most likely be a different, but similar mechanism.&lt;BR /&gt;Stay tuned &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-25T18:59:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56581#M11388</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="s1wjcqzz-10 lkEbBw"&gt;I have two 77.30 gateways using ClusterXL in high availability mode. Looking at doing a connectivity upgrade from 77.30 to 80.20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="s1wjcqzz-10 lkEbBw"&gt;After I upgrade the standby member I'm looking to fail over after hours and test connectivity, but then fail back and leave the 77.30 member running for a few more days. Is this supported? I guess my question is, can you fail back over to the 77.30 member once you fail over to the upgraded 80.20 cluster member? I've read over the R80.20 "Upgrading a Security Gateways and Cluster" section in the Installation and Upgrade Guide, but this part isn't clear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="s1wjcqzz-10 lkEbBw"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56581#M11388</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh_B</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-24T21:36:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56583#M11390</link>
      <description>I believe the sync is only "one-way" in a Connectivity Upgrade.&lt;BR /&gt;Meaning once you fail over to R80.20, connections aren't synced to R77.30.&lt;BR /&gt;I'll see if I can get a definitive answer, though.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56583#M11390</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-24T21:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56585#M11391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, much appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is what I believe I was understanding. If I failed back over to R77.30, I would lose all connections. I would be OK with this as it I'm doing this during a planed maintenance window. I wanted to be sure I wouldn't be causing any issues when I failed back over to R80.20&amp;nbsp; during the second maintenance window a few days later, where I planned to keep the R80.20 cluster member as the active.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56585#M11391</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh_B</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-24T22:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56586#M11392</link>
      <description>Confirmed with R&amp;amp;D that Connectivity Upgrade is a one-way sync.&lt;BR /&gt;It is possible to fail back to R77.30 by performing a cpstart on that cluster member (assuming R80.20 upgrade was done on the standby member), but you lose all connections and redundancy is obviously limited.&lt;BR /&gt;We do plan to improve this in later releases.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56586#M11392</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-25T00:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56589#M11393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a very nice information that we can use FCU to sync to a lower version in the future.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56589#M11393</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-25T05:51:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 77.30 to 80.20 - Cluster connectivity upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56638#M11405</link>
      <description>It will most likely be a different, but similar mechanism.&lt;BR /&gt;Stay tuned &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/77-30-to-80-20-Cluster-connectivity-upgrade-question/m-p/56638#M11405</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-25T18:59:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

