<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISP Redundancy for 5 links. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-for-5-links/m-p/55595#M11113</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You will need an external router for that setup&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-12T09:51:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP Redundancy for 5 links.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-for-5-links/m-p/55404#M11062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our customer is asking for a ISP load sharing for five internet links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whereas R80.10 bydefault support on two ISP load sharing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What all options do we have now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-for-5-links/m-p/55404#M11062</guid>
      <dc:creator>gautam_kumar1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-10T07:30:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Redundancy for 5 links.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-for-5-links/m-p/55595#M11113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You will need an external router for that setup&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-for-5-links/m-p/55595#M11113</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-12T09:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

