<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3200 Appliance deployment in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53750#M10736</link>
    <description>I see no reason to keep the ASA here.&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously you want to replicate the configuration on the Check Point.&lt;BR /&gt;The SmartMove tool may make this process a bit easier.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 01:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-18T01:40:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3200 Appliance deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53711#M10729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had to deploy a 3200 Appliance in a customer network. Diagram in attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I expect to push the 3200 in front of the ASA Appliance and I would like to know if this postion is the bestest for the config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the other hand I have the choice between removing the ASA Appliance and doing the config only with the CheckPoint or keeping the ASA (Customer give me the choice). Configs on the ASA : Openning ports for internal Application, ACLs, VPN (Not working because licence is off since 3 years).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in this situation what's the best config to do ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 14:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53711#M10729</guid>
      <dc:creator>AdaCoul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T14:33:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3200 Appliance deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53750#M10736</link>
      <description>I see no reason to keep the ASA here.&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously you want to replicate the configuration on the Check Point.&lt;BR /&gt;The SmartMove tool may make this process a bit easier.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 01:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53750#M10736</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-18T01:40:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3200 Appliance deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53756#M10738</link>
      <description>Hi PhoneBoy,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the the same thing I told my self.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank a lot for your reply</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 07:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/3200-Appliance-deployment/m-p/53756#M10738</guid>
      <dc:creator>AdaCoul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-18T07:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

