<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DO NOT MISS - AI Security Report 2026 in General AI Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-AI-Discussion/DO-NOT-MISS-AI-Security-Report-2026/m-p/280229#M90</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Originally posted &lt;A href="https://research.checkpoint.com/2026/ai-security-report-2026/" target="_self"&gt;at &amp;lt;CP/R&amp;gt; blog&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="wp-block-paragraph"&gt;For years, the cyber security industry tracked AI as a force multiplier: something that made existing attack techniques faster, cheaper, and more accessible. That framing was accurate. But the Annual AI Security Report 2026 from Check Point Research documents a transition that goes further. AI has crossed from assistant to operator. Where it once helped attackers prepare, it now runs the operation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2 class="wp-block-heading"&gt;Key observed findings&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;UL class="wp-block-list"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI has crossed from development aid to live attack&amp;nbsp;operator.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;It now does the hands-on work inside live intrusions, from China-nexus espionage campaigns to a criminal breach of multiple Mexican government agencies and has spread from nation states to ordinary cyber criminals.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI now builds deployment-ready malware and attack suites.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Its involvement is often invisible in the finished artifact: one developer used an AI environment to produce&amp;nbsp;VoidLink, an 88,000-line command-and-control offensive framework, in under a week.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Attackers prefer commercial models, and now abuse them by exploiting the agentic architecture, not just single prompts.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Most actors favor jailbroken mainstream models over self-hosted ones, and the durable bypass is now a planted configuration&amp;nbsp;file&amp;nbsp;an agent loads and trusts across sessions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;An AI-enabled criminal tooling market has matured.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Phishing-as-a-service kits now embed a language model with the jailbreak built in, and conversational AI voice-agent services run vishing and one-time-passcode theft at scale.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Virtual Identity is no longer a reliable trust anchor.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Voice, face, documents, and live video are now cheap to forge convincingly and are widely used in attacks taking multi-channel social engineering to a new level of integration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI itself is an expanding attack surface.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Models cannot always separate data from instructions and content they process might influence the model’s behavior; the surrounding stack adds ordinary software vulnerabilities and supply-chain risk, all in a rapidly evolving ecosystem where security practices not always mature.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Indirect prompt injection is on the rise.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Detections of longer malicious payloads increased sharply, rising&amp;nbsp;roughly fivefold&amp;nbsp;between March and May 2026 and approaching 1% of observed prompts in May. Longer payloads are more&amp;nbsp;typical of content-borne and agentic attack&amp;nbsp;paths,&amp;nbsp;this pattern suggests that indirect prompt injection is becoming more operationally relevant.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enterprise data leakage through GenAI is persistent and growing risk&lt;/STRONG&gt;. High-risk prompts doubled from 2% to 4% during the last year, while organizations used an average of 10 AI applications each month, many without official approval.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data exposure risks are not&amp;nbsp;evenly&amp;nbsp;distributed across the verticals&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Sector-level analysis reveals that AI-related data exposure risks are not evenly distributed across the&amp;nbsp;verticals, and&amp;nbsp;correlate both with AI usage patterns and security maturity. Business Services recorded the highest rate of high-risk GenAI prompts at 5.91%, meaning&amp;nbsp;nearly one&amp;nbsp;in every 17 AI interactions carried a significant risk of sensitive data exposure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="wp-block-paragraph"&gt;To read the full findings, access the AI Security Report 2026 from Check Point Research&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://engage.checkpoint.com/ai-security-report-2026" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"&gt;here.&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-27T10:25:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DO NOT MISS - AI Security Report 2026</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-AI-Discussion/DO-NOT-MISS-AI-Security-Report-2026/m-p/280229#M90</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Originally posted &lt;A href="https://research.checkpoint.com/2026/ai-security-report-2026/" target="_self"&gt;at &amp;lt;CP/R&amp;gt; blog&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="wp-block-paragraph"&gt;For years, the cyber security industry tracked AI as a force multiplier: something that made existing attack techniques faster, cheaper, and more accessible. That framing was accurate. But the Annual AI Security Report 2026 from Check Point Research documents a transition that goes further. AI has crossed from assistant to operator. Where it once helped attackers prepare, it now runs the operation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2 class="wp-block-heading"&gt;Key observed findings&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;UL class="wp-block-list"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI has crossed from development aid to live attack&amp;nbsp;operator.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;It now does the hands-on work inside live intrusions, from China-nexus espionage campaigns to a criminal breach of multiple Mexican government agencies and has spread from nation states to ordinary cyber criminals.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI now builds deployment-ready malware and attack suites.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Its involvement is often invisible in the finished artifact: one developer used an AI environment to produce&amp;nbsp;VoidLink, an 88,000-line command-and-control offensive framework, in under a week.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Attackers prefer commercial models, and now abuse them by exploiting the agentic architecture, not just single prompts.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Most actors favor jailbroken mainstream models over self-hosted ones, and the durable bypass is now a planted configuration&amp;nbsp;file&amp;nbsp;an agent loads and trusts across sessions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;An AI-enabled criminal tooling market has matured.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Phishing-as-a-service kits now embed a language model with the jailbreak built in, and conversational AI voice-agent services run vishing and one-time-passcode theft at scale.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Virtual Identity is no longer a reliable trust anchor.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Voice, face, documents, and live video are now cheap to forge convincingly and are widely used in attacks taking multi-channel social engineering to a new level of integration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AI itself is an expanding attack surface.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Models cannot always separate data from instructions and content they process might influence the model’s behavior; the surrounding stack adds ordinary software vulnerabilities and supply-chain risk, all in a rapidly evolving ecosystem where security practices not always mature.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Indirect prompt injection is on the rise.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Detections of longer malicious payloads increased sharply, rising&amp;nbsp;roughly fivefold&amp;nbsp;between March and May 2026 and approaching 1% of observed prompts in May. Longer payloads are more&amp;nbsp;typical of content-borne and agentic attack&amp;nbsp;paths,&amp;nbsp;this pattern suggests that indirect prompt injection is becoming more operationally relevant.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enterprise data leakage through GenAI is persistent and growing risk&lt;/STRONG&gt;. High-risk prompts doubled from 2% to 4% during the last year, while organizations used an average of 10 AI applications each month, many without official approval.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data exposure risks are not&amp;nbsp;evenly&amp;nbsp;distributed across the verticals&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Sector-level analysis reveals that AI-related data exposure risks are not evenly distributed across the&amp;nbsp;verticals, and&amp;nbsp;correlate both with AI usage patterns and security maturity. Business Services recorded the highest rate of high-risk GenAI prompts at 5.91%, meaning&amp;nbsp;nearly one&amp;nbsp;in every 17 AI interactions carried a significant risk of sensitive data exposure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="wp-block-paragraph"&gt;To read the full findings, access the AI Security Report 2026 from Check Point Research&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://engage.checkpoint.com/ai-security-report-2026" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"&gt;here.&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-AI-Discussion/DO-NOT-MISS-AI-Security-Report-2026/m-p/280229#M90</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-27T10:25:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

