<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Offline detection in HEP in Endpoint</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176521#M6781</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Detection based on signatures is one but not the only approach that is valid in such as case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-29T07:00:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Offline detection in HEP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176520#M6780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can I confirm that an attack that can be detected offline by HEP is when you already know the signature?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176520#M6780</guid>
      <dc:creator>kanah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-29T06:39:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Offline detection in HEP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176521#M6781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Detection based on signatures is one but not the only approach that is valid in such as case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176521#M6781</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-29T07:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Offline detection in HEP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176525#M6782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your prompt reply. What are other approaches?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:37:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176525#M6782</guid>
      <dc:creator>kanah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-29T07:37:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Offline detection in HEP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176668#M6785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Anti-ransomware, Behavioral Guard, Port protection, Firewall each offer mitigations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To this end you've not qualified if the client is permanently or temporarily offline.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 23:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Offline-detection-in-HEP/m-p/176668#M6785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-29T23:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

