<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Remote Access clients configuration based on group membership in Endpoint</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Remote-Access-clients-configuration-based-on-group-membership/m-p/108397#M3890</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have to use individual configuration for our ras vpn users. Using check point mobile vpn (windows) client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We implemented our requirement with the procedure described in &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A title=" Remote Access clients configuration based on group membership" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk114882&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint" target="_self"&gt;sk114882&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and it works fine. Thus we have some ttm_groups defined on managment server and the corresponding ttm-configfiles on the gateways. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As long we have only user objects in the ttm_group everything is working as expected. When adding also usergroups , it will not work for users in that added (nested) group.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It looks like that users in a nested group not correctly enforced.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How can this behaviour changed, or does a ttm_group not work with nested groups?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is highly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Markus_Kress</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-21T13:50:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Remote Access clients configuration based on group membership</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Remote-Access-clients-configuration-based-on-group-membership/m-p/108397#M3890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have to use individual configuration for our ras vpn users. Using check point mobile vpn (windows) client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We implemented our requirement with the procedure described in &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A title=" Remote Access clients configuration based on group membership" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk114882&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint" target="_self"&gt;sk114882&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and it works fine. Thus we have some ttm_groups defined on managment server and the corresponding ttm-configfiles on the gateways. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As long we have only user objects in the ttm_group everything is working as expected. When adding also usergroups , it will not work for users in that added (nested) group.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It looks like that users in a nested group not correctly enforced.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How can this behaviour changed, or does a ttm_group not work with nested groups?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is highly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/Remote-Access-clients-configuration-based-on-group-membership/m-p/108397#M3890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Markus_Kress</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-21T13:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

