<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CheckPoint VPN client fails if host have too many IPs in Endpoint</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257398#M10811</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We use a kernel driver to redirect traffic to the correct interface.&lt;BR /&gt;That means all interfaces are relevant.&lt;BR /&gt;A TAC case is in order, but I suspect this might be an RFE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-16T16:31:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CheckPoint VPN client fails if host have too many IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257237#M10804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have&amp;nbsp;"Endpoint Security VPN"&amp;nbsp;client_ver (E88.40)&amp;nbsp;client_build_number (986105609) installed on my laptop.&lt;BR /&gt;It provides "Ethernet 3" (Check Point Virtual Network Adapter For Endpoint VPN Client) adapter to the corporate LAN.&lt;BR /&gt;It connects to the Internet via an "Ethernet" (physical) adapter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I also have "Microsoft KM-TEST Loopback Adapter" (see&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/networking/install-microsoft-loopback-adapter" target="_self"&gt;method2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Before you ask why I need it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I need it to perform TCP tunnelling via ssh, like this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;ssh -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes -N   -L 192.168.201.1:22:10.138.1.1:22  -L 192.168.202.1:22:10.138.2.1:22 user@sshgateway&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;That is, the KM-TEST adapter got multiple IPs assigned to it (one per remote target ip):&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;$gateway = "0.0.0.0"
$mask = "255.255.252.0"
netsh interface ipv4 set address $pp.local_adapter_name static $first_ip $mask $gateway
foreach ($node in $pp.remote_nodes){
	netsh interface ipv4 add address $pp.local_adapter_name $node.local_ip $mask $gateway
}
# just-in-case:
netsh interface ipv4 set interface $pp.local_adapter_name metric=9990&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I'm unable to use a single IP and a multitude of ports to access all those remote nodes. Because one app I need does not allow to explicitly specify ports.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This setup worked OK, in general, with 122 IPs assigned to the "&lt;SPAN&gt;KM-TEST Loopback Adapter" for a few months already&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Today I've tried to add 20 more IPs, and suddenly CheckPoint VPN got broken - stuck in a reconnect loop saying "Connectivity with the Check Point Endpoint Security service is lost".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Even though CheckPoint fails, other apps seem to work OK - e.g. I'm still able to use Chrome web browser and etc.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;CheckPoint VPN starts to work again as soon as I reduce the number of IPs (assigned to the "&lt;SPAN&gt;KM-TEST Loopback Adapter" adapter)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to 128. Fails with 129. Specific IPs do no matter - removing either "new" or "old" ones fixes CheckPoint.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To my best knowledge, these "192.168.200.0/22" IPs should not conflict with anything.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So... It looks like CheckPoint VPN client breaks if there are &amp;gt;128 IPs on some network adapter in the system. Even though CheckPoint&amp;nbsp; should actually just completely ignore this adapter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please suggest any fix/workaround?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 15:32:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257237#M10804</guid>
      <dc:creator>i3v</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-14T15:32:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CheckPoint VPN client fails if host have too many IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257324#M10808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont know if thats indeed some sort of limitation or not, but seems like you already had done lots of testing/trounleshooting yourself, so I would definitely open TAC case at this point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257324#M10808</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T23:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CheckPoint VPN client fails if host have too many IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257398#M10811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We use a kernel driver to redirect traffic to the correct interface.&lt;BR /&gt;That means all interfaces are relevant.&lt;BR /&gt;A TAC case is in order, but I suspect this might be an RFE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint/CheckPoint-VPN-client-fails-if-host-have-too-many-IPs/m-p/257398#M10811</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-16T16:31:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

