<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Time Object Documentation Issue in API / CLI Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179618#M7670</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Given how time objects are constructed I’m not surprised those limitations exist.&lt;BR /&gt;They should be documented, though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37502"&gt;@Omer_Kleinstern&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 18:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-01T18:59:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Time Object Documentation Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179549#M7668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;'&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/latest/APIs/index.html#cli/add-time~v1.9%20" target="_self"&gt;add time&lt;/A&gt;' and '&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/latest/APIs/index.html#cli/set-time~v1.9%20" target="_self"&gt;set time&lt;/A&gt;' say they accept a list of objects in the hours-ranges property, but they don't say:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can only include three objects&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Index is optional (and will be populated from the order of the objects if it isn't present)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Index is only allowed to be 0, 1, 2, or 3&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Index 0 is allowed, but appears to work like leaving the index out of the object entirely. The object's index is determined by its placement in the hours-ranges list.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If two hours-ranges objects are given the same index, the later object overwrites the first one, even when provided together&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 15:30:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179549#M7668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-30T15:30:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time Object Documentation Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179618#M7670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Given how time objects are constructed I’m not surprised those limitations exist.&lt;BR /&gt;They should be documented, though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37502"&gt;@Omer_Kleinstern&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 18:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179618#M7670</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T18:59:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time Object Documentation Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179621#M7671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I definitely get it. For this, I'm only concerned with documentation for people who come along later.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think this is the only list I've run into which only accepts a certain number of objects. Also I think it's the only list I've seen where members can be given an index. Not surprising that rare situations have unusual edge cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 19:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179621#M7671</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T19:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time Object Documentation Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179679#M7672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm with you on the documentation being accurate. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 13:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179679#M7672</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-02T13:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time Object Documentation Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179799#M7675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the input; I've opened an issue for R&amp;amp;D to look at it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 09:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Time-Object-Documentation-Issue/m-p/179799#M7675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tal_Paz-Fridman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-03T09:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

