<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections? in API / CLI Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129898#M6262</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, those automatic sections are fixed across all policy packages and there's no way to create sections like that through other means.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-21T22:47:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129720#M6251</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a good way to identify auto-generated NAT sections without trying to add new NAT rules to them?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The NAT rules they contain all have the "&lt;SPAN&gt;auto-generated" flag set to true, but these sections&amp;nbsp;don't necessarily contain NAT rules, so I can't use that.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They all have names like "&lt;SPAN&gt;Automatic Generated Rules : Machine Static NAT", but nothing keeps a human from naming a section similarly. Names have to be unique, so I guess I could key off of the exact names? Not great, but may work.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129720#M6251</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-19T20:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129737#M6253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I'd probably use the name as your key (short of adding NAT rules, of course).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 03:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129737#M6253</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T03:46:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129895#M6259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which brings up another potentially interesting question. The automatic NAT sections exist in all policies at once. Same NAT section object shows up in each, and the same NAT rule objects show up in the sections.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can normal NAT sections be in more than one policy package? I don't think they can, but I don't know if anything actually prevents the same section from being in multiple policies like an automatic section.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129895#M6259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-21T21:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129896#M6260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nothing is preventing you from having the same NAT section defined in multiple policy packages.&lt;BR /&gt;However, it's specific to that policy package.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129896#M6260</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-21T22:33:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129897#M6261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That would be different sections with the same name, though. What I'm saying it every single policy package has in its NAT rulebase&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;exactly the same&lt;/EM&gt; "&lt;SPAN&gt;Automatic Generated Rules : Machine Static NAT" section. Not copies, but the same section with the same UUID. This means NAT sections don't have just one parent policy package but could potentially have many parent policy packages. I want to confirm whether that situation is allowed for human-created NAT sections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don't see a way to cause that situation with the API, but the public API still has some limitations compared to what the management server allows to be done through other means.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129897#M6261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-21T22:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying Auto-Generated NAT Sections?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129898#M6262</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, those automatic sections are fixed across all policy packages and there's no way to create sections like that through other means.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Identifying-Auto-Generated-NAT-Sections/m-p/129898#M6262</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-21T22:47:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

