<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: when R8x REST API expanded to include URLF blade? in API / CLI Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/when-R8x-REST-API-expanded-to-include-URLF-blade/m-p/5837#M499</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically what you're asking for is to expose an API similar to what we've done for &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/space/2063"&gt;SandBlast API&lt;/A&gt;‌ (i.e. for other parts of ThreatCloud).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a good suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-01T17:19:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>when R8x REST API expanded to include URLF blade?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/when-R8x-REST-API-expanded-to-include-URLF-blade/m-p/5836#M498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello -- This is topic frequently raised with local CP engineering team, but I figured I would push to larger audience. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As of CP REST API v1.1, there is only small support for AppCtl blade.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas when (if) the CP REST API will ever support URLF blade?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would love to displace Websense (Forcepoint) in couple accounts and are limited by fact there's no CP API options to interact with URLF blade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;example: &amp;nbsp; customer has customer developed internal self-help user awareness web site for checking web sites provided in email. &amp;nbsp; customer has more than 5k users.&amp;nbsp; If someone receives email from someone they don't know and includes a "click here" link, users are educated enough to right-click, copy, and paste into form on their self-help web site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The web page queries the Websense (Forcepoint) filter service and establishes category, threat level (if any), and whether user would be able to access (based on their username + IP + policy).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, CP has various protections to guard against&amp;nbsp; phishing URL links (example:&amp;nbsp; sandblast for browsers), but this requires completely new product purchase (vs just enabling URLF blade on gateways) and educating end-users on different procedure.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus, we are hoping that CP R8x REST API will be expanded for programmatic interaction with URLF blade functions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;examples:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;query URLF blade for classification&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;query URLF blade for action if user accesses URL provided&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check URL reputation (if possible as this is stored in antibot).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks -GA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/when-R8x-REST-API-expanded-to-include-URLF-blade/m-p/5836#M498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Garrett_DirSec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-31T17:49:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: when R8x REST API expanded to include URLF blade?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/when-R8x-REST-API-expanded-to-include-URLF-blade/m-p/5837#M499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically what you're asking for is to expose an API similar to what we've done for &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/space/2063"&gt;SandBlast API&lt;/A&gt;‌ (i.e. for other parts of ThreatCloud).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a good suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/when-R8x-REST-API-expanded-to-include-URLF-blade/m-p/5837#M499</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T17:19:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

