<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VC++ 2005 still required? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23673#M98508</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dameon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since this is no longer supported by Microsoft, would you reckon this is going to change in one of the next versions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 05:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jan_de_Gier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-17T05:16:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23671#M98506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone tell if Visual C++ 2005 is still a requirement for R80.10?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our QualysGuard Vulnerability Management scanner complains about an EOL version VC++ 2005 on the Jumphost we are using for Managing our Firewalls, which I believe it was installed as a dependency when I installed the latest R80.10 smartconsole.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px;"&gt;The host is running Microsoft VC++ 2005 which is not supported by Microsoft anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Support for Microsoft VC++ 2005 ended on April 12th, 2016. Microsoft will no longer release security patches for Microsoft VC++ 2005. Refer to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/search?alpha=Visual%20Studio" target="_blank"&gt;Microsoft Support Lifecycle&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;for more information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Note: This QID will be also be reported on Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Many thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 01:46:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23671#M98506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_de_Gier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T01:46:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23672#M98507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are correct, we require it as part of SmartConsole.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dependencies include (from&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk116158" title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk116158"&gt;Portable SmartConsole for R80.10&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Visual C++ (x86) 2005 Redistributable&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Visual C++ (x86) 2010 Redistributable&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Visual C++ (x86) 2012 Redistributable&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;.NET Framework 4.5&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 05:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23672#M98507</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T05:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23673#M98508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dameon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since this is no longer supported by Microsoft, would you reckon this is going to change in one of the next versions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 05:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23673#M98508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_de_Gier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T05:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23674#M98509</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would expect it to, yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 05:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23674#M98509</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T05:21:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23675#M98510</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still required?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:04:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23675#M98510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Agent_Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T19:04:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VC++ 2005 still required?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23676#M98511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;R80.20 and above does not require Visual C++ (x86) 2005 Redistributable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is noted in the SK I linked to previously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VC-2005-still-required/m-p/23676#M98511</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T19:59:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

