<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two NAT64 rules in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23524#M98492</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But each rule works fine&amp;nbsp;if disable&amp;nbsp;one of these. For example, when i disabling rule 1, policy would install normally and second rule works fine&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;and vice versa&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Farkhad_Mameto1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-18T07:28:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two NAT64 rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23522#M98490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Team! Could you kindly help me? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;fwm ver&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;This is Check Point Security Management Server R77.30 - Build 035&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Installed Plug-ins: R77.20 Add-on, R77.30 Add-on&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have faced with problem when trying to install 2 &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/tag/nat64/tg-p"&gt;&lt;/A&gt; rules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First rule - embedded NAT64 translation for users who has only IPv6 addresses to reach IPv4 networks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second rule - Static NAT64 for external IPv6 users who have to reach IPv4 site on the local network which has no IPv6 address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rules:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/62136_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Errors appear when I am trying to install policy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/62137_pastedImage_4.png" style="width: auto; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I disable one of the rules - policy installing normally&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 03:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23522#M98490</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farkhad_Mameto1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T03:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two NAT64 rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23523#M98491</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe your second rule is incorrectly defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I discussed the correct way to create that rule here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/message/9501-re-ipv6-with-checkpoint-r7730" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/message/9501-re-ipv6-with-checkpoint-r7730&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23523#M98491</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:11:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two NAT64 rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23524#M98492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But each rule works fine&amp;nbsp;if disable&amp;nbsp;one of these. For example, when i disabling rule 1, policy would install normally and second rule works fine&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;and vice versa&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23524#M98492</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farkhad_Mameto1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T07:28:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two NAT64 rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23525#M98493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I've created rule 2 as your described in &lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="" data-containerid="2030" data-containertype="14" data-objectid="5830" data-objecttype="1" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/5830-ipv6-with-checkpoint-r7730" style="color: #6d6e71; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; padding: 1px 0px 1px calc(12px + 0.35ex);"&gt;IPv6 with Checkpoint R77.30&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only one thing, when I replace translated destination address to IPv4_Site it change from "64" to "s". But this rule works fine (if disabling rule one)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23525#M98493</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farkhad_Mameto1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T10:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two NAT64 rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23526#M98494</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you opened a ticket with TAC on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It could very well be some sort of policy validation bug that we need to investigate further.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://www.checkpoint.com/support-services/contact-support/index.html" title="http://www.checkpoint.com/support-services/contact-support/index.html"&gt;Contact Support | Check Point Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-NAT64-rules/m-p/23526#M98494</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T15:04:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

