<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spinning up Virtual on 5400/5600 - Licensing and Resource Allocation. in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/62134#M9665</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;VSX is very flexible and scalable technology allowing virtual security gateways (called Virtual Systems), virtual switches or even virtual routers (not very common). The number of VSs in a platform depends on the license, hardware platform, amount of traffic and enabled software blades.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As Phoneboy mentioned discuss with your local Check Point team about the best solution for your needs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 02:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lari_Luoma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-07T02:14:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spinning up Virtual on 5400/5600 - Licensing and Resource Allocation.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/61543#M9662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am considering replacing couple of 4400's with 5400s/5600's.&amp;nbsp; Keen to create virtual route domains on the appliance/cluster to help improve on the design. (Vsys?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the platform itself supports upto 20 virtuals but not able to establishing licensing or resource allocation methods/process .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate if you could help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/61543#M9662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Senthil-Krishna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-30T10:40:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spinning up Virtual on 5400/5600 - Licensing and Resource Allocation.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/61556#M9663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are licensing considerations on both gateway and management for Virtual Systems (see the datasheet). Typically more memory is also advantageous in such systems (gateway).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CoreXL instances &amp;amp; Connection table values within Dashboard help manage your available resources (cpu/men) at a basic level,more advanced config available via CLI but typically only useful in systems with more cores.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/61556#M9663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-31T10:24:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spinning up Virtual on 5400/5600 - Licensing and Resource Allocation.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/62129#M9664</link>
      <description>If you just want virtual route domains and you're running OSPF, you don't need VSX as R80.20 supports this.&lt;BR /&gt;This will be much more lightweight than VSX which creates multiple virtual security gateways on the same hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;If you really need 20 VSes, a 5400 or 5600 may not be adequate.&lt;BR /&gt;Highly recommend you reach out to your local Check Point SE to discuss your exact requirements in detail.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/62129#M9664</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T23:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spinning up Virtual on 5400/5600 - Licensing and Resource Allocation.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/62134#M9665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;VSX is very flexible and scalable technology allowing virtual security gateways (called Virtual Systems), virtual switches or even virtual routers (not very common). The number of VSs in a platform depends on the license, hardware platform, amount of traffic and enabled software blades.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As Phoneboy mentioned discuss with your local Check Point team about the best solution for your needs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 02:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Spinning-up-Virtual-on-5400-5600-Licensing-and-Resource/m-p/62134#M9665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lari_Luoma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-07T02:14:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

