<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geo Active-active Datacenter firewall architecture in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59466#M9630</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Nuno,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please note the requirements mentioned by Heiko.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can use VSLS ( Virtual System Load Sharing) with your VSX you can build a VSX cluster with 4 nodes, two in every location. With VSLS you can distribute your virtual system beetween all nodes. As an example you have 4 VS, you can run one VS on every node in your VSX-cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VSLS can't be used if you are using a virtual-router in your environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 05:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-02T05:56:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geo Active-active Datacenter firewall architecture</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59436#M9628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are checkpoint costumer. Currently we have two VSX clusters in two geographic locations with production and disaster recovery site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In near future we will change this to active-active architecture streching the network in both geographies using Cisco ACI with VxLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please advise us with the best scenario for firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need two clusters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we have firewall instance in both geographies for the same networking "zone".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nuno&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:23:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59436#M9628</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndcosta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T13:23:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo Active-active Datacenter firewall architecture</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59452#M9629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are using a VSX Cluster with gateways at two locations, you must comply with the following ClusterXL parameters:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp;maximum sync / CCP packet delay: 100 ms&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp;maximum sync / CCP packet lost: 0.2%&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Layer 2 connection between the locations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;More read here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk93306&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL," target="_self"&gt;ATRG: ClusterXL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59452#M9629</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T20:32:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo Active-active Datacenter firewall architecture</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59466#M9630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nuno,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please note the requirements mentioned by Heiko.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can use VSLS ( Virtual System Load Sharing) with your VSX you can build a VSX cluster with 4 nodes, two in every location. With VSLS you can distribute your virtual system beetween all nodes. As an example you have 4 VS, you can run one VS on every node in your VSX-cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VSLS can't be used if you are using a virtual-router in your environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 05:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59466#M9630</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-02T05:56:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geo Active-active Datacenter firewall architecture</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59476#M9631</link>
      <description>Hi everyone, Thank you for sharing your knowledge! Regarding the number os nodes, do we have limitations for VSLS Cluster? Can we have dynamic routing active with this scenario? best regards, Nuno</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Geo-Active-active-Datacenter-firewall-architecture/m-p/59476#M9631</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndcosta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-02T08:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

