<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP in VSX in Active/Established State in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65031#M9510</link>
    <description>Keep in mind that in take 19 there were very few fixes for the gateway, only the later jumbo's also have updates for the gateways.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-15T21:15:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP in VSX in Active/Established State</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/64940#M9507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 virtual systems in a cluster of two 15400s running R80.30, i also have VSLS enabled. I have iBGP running between VS5 and VS6 as well as iBGP between VS6 and VS7. I recently noticed that the peer in VS5 shows an established state and VS6 shows an active state. I can confirm that the networks are fine as i can ping both interfaces when i have the VS in the same gateway or split between gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After some troubleshooting, i notices that when i do a cpstop and cpstart, VS6 becomes established. I also noticed that its only established for about 24hours before it goes back to active state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone come across this. Thank You&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/64940#M9507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Enyi_Ajoku</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-14T13:10:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP in VSX in Active/Established State</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/64956#M9508</link>
      <description>It helps a lot to know which version of code you are running, also the jumbo version. In R80.10 anything below Jumbo 100 there were a lot of dynamic routing issues. Check the list of fixes in the jumbo releases for your version and see if your problem has been recognized and resolved.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:49:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/64956#M9508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-14T14:49:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP in VSX in Active/Established State</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65017#M9509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im running Take 19 at the moment. Although i intend to install Take 79 today&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65017#M9509</guid>
      <dc:creator>Enyi_Ajoku</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-15T15:56:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP in VSX in Active/Established State</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65031#M9510</link>
      <description>Keep in mind that in take 19 there were very few fixes for the gateway, only the later jumbo's also have updates for the gateways.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65031#M9510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-15T21:15:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP in VSX in Active/Established State</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65086#M9511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would rather involve TAC here...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/BGP-in-VSX-in-Active-Established-State/m-p/65086#M9511</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-16T11:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

