<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84719#M9405</link>
    <description>Hi Kaspars ,&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for inconvenience for delay response we have VS1 failover at the time of policy installation . Please find the aoutput of "fw ctl affinity -l" and highlight the issue if have ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@GWvsx1:0]# fw ctl affinity -l&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-04: CPU 2&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-01: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-02: CPU 3&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-03: CPU 4&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;Sync: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;VS_0 fwk: CPU 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;VS_1 fwk: CPU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;VS_2 fwk: CPU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-02: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-03: has multi queue enabled</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 10:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vikupoi_123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-10T10:20:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75367#M9402</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When we are doing policy installations in the particular VS of VSX gateway. That VS failover is happening..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75367#M9402</guid>
      <dc:creator>vikupoi_123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-15T15:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75388#M9403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you observe any corresponding CUL&amp;nbsp;messages?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would suggest sharing further information (including version/JHF level) with TAC to investigate the issue further.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2020 10:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75388#M9403</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-16T10:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75571#M9404</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We had a "very busy" VS that was impossible to push during day time / peak hour.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then we separated fwk and rest of the processes on that VS using affinity and all started working OK&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;fw ctl affinity -l&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;VS_10: CPU 1 21&lt;BR /&gt;VS_10 fwk: CPU 13 14 15 33 34 35&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so you can see that 6 cores are used only for fwk workers and two (1 and 21) for all other purposes including policy push handling.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But as mentioned earlier you need to supply more info with logs etc, could be something totally different&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/75571#M9404</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-18T09:23:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84719#M9405</link>
      <description>Hi Kaspars ,&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for inconvenience for delay response we have VS1 failover at the time of policy installation . Please find the aoutput of "fw ctl affinity -l" and highlight the issue if have ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@GWvsx1:0]# fw ctl affinity -l&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-04: CPU 2&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-01: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-02: CPU 3&lt;BR /&gt;eth2-03: CPU 4&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;Sync: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;VS_0 fwk: CPU 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;VS_1 fwk: CPU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;VS_2 fwk: CPU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-02: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-03: has multi queue enabled</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 10:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84719#M9405</guid>
      <dc:creator>vikupoi_123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-10T10:20:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84723#M9406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Out of interest is this an R80.20 VSX gateway?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 12:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84723#M9406</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-10T12:22:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84725#M9407</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No it is R77.20 GW&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 12:36:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84725#M9407</guid>
      <dc:creator>vikupoi_123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-10T12:36:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual systems failover after policy installation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84761#M9408</link>
      <description>R77.20 has been End of Support for quite a while now.&lt;BR /&gt;Recommend upgrading to a supported release.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 22:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Virtual-systems-failover-after-policy-installation/m-p/84761#M9408</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-10T22:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

