<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, V in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89590#M9010</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;THX for the link, strange the search did not find anything related to this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;BR /&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Martin_Peinsipp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-23T18:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, VSX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89533#M9006</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We had a huge problem on a VSX-Cluster (R80.30, jumbo-take 155) after installing jumbo-take 196. After the reboot of the inactive cluster-node (cluster state was fine) we performed a manual failover ("vsx_util vsls") to this fw-node. Right after this, we had a overall taffic-outage because the policy was not enforced correctly. Most traffic was blocked based on the last clean-up-rule.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We did not have enough time time analyze the problem (fw ctl zdebug, we only checked the size of the connection-table, which was very low at this time), so we uninstalled jumbo-take 196 again. After the reboot we had the same problem on both cluster-nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We had to push the policy manualy. Right after this, everything was working fine again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Befor this procedure the cluster was working fine and we did not have any issues with failover at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are already in contact with the TAC-Team.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any ideas regarding this strange behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89533#M9006</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin_Peinsipp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T21:30:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, V</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89535#M9007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are other posts already about this issue !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89535#M9007</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T09:39:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, V</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89539#M9008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share a link, I did not find similar posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89539#M9008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin_Peinsipp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T10:13:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, V</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89561#M9009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/r80-30-take196-fw-unable-to-accept-new-connections-till-fwpol-is/m-p/89448" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/r80-30-take196-fw-unable-to-accept-new-connections-till-fwpol-is/m-p/89448&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89561#M9009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T13:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No proper policy-enforcement after installing jumbo-take 196 on top of jumbo-take 155 (R80.30, V</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89590#M9010</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;THX for the link, strange the search did not find anything related to this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;BR /&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-proper-policy-enforcement-after-installing-jumbo-take-196-on/m-p/89590#M9010</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin_Peinsipp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T18:40:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

