<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95856#M8740</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;can you share "cat /proc/net/bonding/&amp;lt;bond-name&amp;gt;" and from clish "show bonding groups"?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ilya_Yusupov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-02T13:44:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95850#M8737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are on R80.40 Take 67 using VSX VSLS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We noticed that our SND Cores are always between 80 and 100 %. This didn't even changed when we added some cores to MultiQueue. We changed MutiQueue to 8 Queues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment there are 2 Cores at &amp;gt;80%. Is this a normal behaviour? We didn't seem to have had this issue with R80.30.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;%Cpu0 : 0.0 us, 2.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 88.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 8.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu1 : 0.0 us, 2.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 17.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.4 hi, 80.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu2 : 0.0 us, 5.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 12.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.4 hi, 81.4 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu3 : 0.0 us, 0.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 93.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 6.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu4 : 10.1 us, 4.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu5 : 18.5 us, 4.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu6 : 11.0 us, 5.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu7 : 14.8 us, 4.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu8 : 20.7 us, 5.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu9 : 18.2 us, 4.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu10 : 11.0 us, 6.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu11 : 16.4 us, 5.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 77.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu12 : 14.9 us, 5.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu13 : 13.7 us, 5.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu14 : 19.3 us, 6.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.7 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu15 : 8.7 us, 5.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu16 : 0.0 us, 0.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 92.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 6.6 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu17 : 0.0 us, 0.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 91.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 8.4 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu18 : 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 81.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 17.4 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu19 : 0.0 us, 0.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 93.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 6.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu20 : 7.9 us, 5.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu21 : 19.3 us, 3.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu22 : 7.6 us, 4.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 87.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu23 : 5.0 us, 3.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 92.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu24 : 12.6 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu25 : 4.3 us, 2.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 93.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu26 : 11.0 us, 2.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu27 : 9.0 us, 1.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 89.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu28 : 26.2 us, 4.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 66.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 2.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu29 : 16.7 us, 2.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu30 : 12.1 us, 3.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.3 hi, 1.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu31 : 26.9 us, 3.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 67.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 1.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@fw-inet-01:0]# mq_mng -o -vv&lt;BR /&gt;Total 32 cores. Multiqueue 8 cores: 0,16,1,17,2,18,3,19&lt;BR /&gt;i/f type state mode cores&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt igb Up Auto (2/2)* 0(58),0(182)&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 ixgbe Up Manual (8/8) 0(70),1(71),2(74),3(75),16(76)&lt;BR /&gt;,17(77),18(78),19(79)&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 ixgbe Up Manual (8/8) 0(81),1(82),2(83),3(89),16(90)&lt;BR /&gt;,17(91),18(92),19(93)&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 ixgbe Up Manual (8/8) 0(65),1(66),2(95),3(96),16(97)&lt;BR /&gt;,17(98),18(99),19(100)&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02 ixgbe Up Manual (8/8) 0(67),1(68),2(102),3(103),16(1&lt;BR /&gt;04),17(105),18(112),19(113)&lt;BR /&gt;* Management interface&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt &amp;lt;igb&amp;gt; max 2 cur 2&lt;BR /&gt;07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I211 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03)&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 &amp;lt;ixgbe&amp;gt; max 16 cur 8&lt;BR /&gt;87:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 &amp;lt;ixgbe&amp;gt; max 16 cur 8&lt;BR /&gt;87:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 &amp;lt;ixgbe&amp;gt; max 16 cur 8&lt;BR /&gt;04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02 &amp;lt;ixgbe&amp;gt; max 16 cur 8&lt;BR /&gt;04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;core interfaces queue irq rx packets tx packets&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;0 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-0 67 5066 1743166&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-0 65 3103828 5212580&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-0 70 4297313 4704791&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-0 81 5924371 3096900&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt Mgmt-TxRx-0 58 120897 260792&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt-TxRx-1 182 24383 29745&lt;BR /&gt;1 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-1 68 33 1595748&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-1 66 370712775 370857057&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-1 71 3439626 7456325&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-1 82 6387267 1973380&lt;BR /&gt;2 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-2 102 0 1022588&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-2 95 363411661 363079854&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-2 74 3832140 4880679&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-2 83 4962696 2656322&lt;BR /&gt;3 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-3 103 2038 1322402&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-3 96 2782309 4946975&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-3 75 3354513 4134583&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-3 89 4446265 1362053&lt;BR /&gt;16 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-4 104 2024 1312522&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-4 97 4133164 4228302&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-4 76 3947081 6611134&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-4 90 5499293 1598963&lt;BR /&gt;17 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-5 105 0 1653859&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-5 98 3609174 5663060&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-5 77 4522628 7028742&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-5 91 5599895 1303251&lt;BR /&gt;18 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-6 112 19 1588342&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-6 99 22066519 23223659&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-6 78 4633862 4358520&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-6 92 6150507 1791513&lt;BR /&gt;19 eth3-02 eth3-02-TxRx-7 113 4519 2089422&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-7 100 4126068 4193200&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01 eth1-01-TxRx-7 79 4193682 4987312&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02 eth1-02-TxRx-7 93 5728181 1414670&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@fw-inet-01:0]# fw ctl affinity -l&lt;BR /&gt;VS_0 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_1 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_2 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_3 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_4 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_5 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_6 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_7 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_8 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_9 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_22 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;VS_24 fwk: CPU 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Mgmt: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Sync: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth3-01: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth3-02: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-01: has multi queue enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Interface eth1-02: has multi queue enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95850#M8737</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T12:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95853#M8738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21737"&gt;@Jan_Kleinhans&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;according to your outputs we see that eth3-01 have major traffic:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-1 &lt;STRONG&gt;66&lt;/STRONG&gt; 370712775 370857057&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;eth3-01 eth3-01-TxRx-2 &lt;STRONG&gt;95&lt;/STRONG&gt; 363411661 363079854&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;eth3-01 ixgbe Up Manual (8/8) 0(65),&lt;STRONG&gt;1(66),2(95)&lt;/STRONG&gt;,3(96),16(97)&lt;BR /&gt;,17(98),18(99),19(100)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;so from the above it looks CPU1 and CPU2 working hard.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;can you tell which traffic is running on eth3-01? is it different traffic then it was in R80.30?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ilya&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95853#M8738</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Yusupov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T12:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95855#M8739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;traffic is the same as it was before. eth3-01 is part of a LACP bond with eth1-01.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:03:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95855#M8739</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T13:03:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95856#M8740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can you share "cat /proc/net/bonding/&amp;lt;bond-name&amp;gt;" and from clish "show bonding groups"?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95856#M8740</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Yusupov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T13:44:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95860#M8741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your LACP bond supposed to be load sharing between eth3-01 and eth1-01?&amp;nbsp; It isn't, looks like pretty much everything is coming through eth3-01.&amp;nbsp; Any Remote Access VPNs in use?&amp;nbsp; If so see here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk165853&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk165853: High CPU usage on one CPU core when the number of Remote Access users is high&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Beyond that you may have some heavy/elephant flows stuck to queues&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;eth3-01-TxRx-1 and&amp;nbsp;eth3-01-TxRx-2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:03:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95860#M8741</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T14:03:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95884#M8742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21737"&gt;@Jan_Kleinhans&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As described by &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14307"&gt;@Ilya_Yusupov&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, you can see that the mq cpu's are very busy. Ixgbe network card drivers support max 16 queues. You use 8 queues. Because your CoreXL instances are not fully utilized, so you can use more cores for MQ.&amp;nbsp;I would use a 12/20 (first step) or 16/16 (second step) core distribution here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95884#M8742</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T19:31:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95885#M8743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21670"&gt;@HeikoAnkenbrand&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; that you can add more cores to MQ but also i have suspicious as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;mention that Bond LS is not working well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95885#M8743</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Yusupov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-02T19:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95905#M8744</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is the configuration of the bonds on Checkpoint and Cisco Nexus side:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;add bonding group 1&lt;BR /&gt;add bonding group 2&lt;BR /&gt;add bonding group 1 interface eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;add bonding group 1 interface eth3-01&lt;BR /&gt;add bonding group 2 interface eth1-02&lt;BR /&gt;add bonding group 2 interface eth3-02&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 1 mode 8023AD&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 1 lacp-rate slow&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 1 xmit-hash-policy layer3+4&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 2 mode 8023AD&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 2 lacp-rate slow&lt;BR /&gt;set bonding group 2 xmit-hash-policy layer3+4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Ethernet1/5&lt;BR /&gt;description fw-inet-01 eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,640-641,850,904-905,907,909,913-915,918-919,95&lt;BR /&gt;0-952,954-955,959-960,963-964,983,991-992&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree port type edge trunk&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 5 mode active&lt;BR /&gt;no shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface port-channel5&lt;BR /&gt;speed 10000&lt;BR /&gt;description fw-inet-01 eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,640-641,850,904-905,907,909,913-915,918-919,95&lt;BR /&gt;0-952,954-955,959-960,963-964,983,991-992&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree port type edge trunk&lt;BR /&gt;vpc 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We added the kernel parameter&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;cphwd_medium_path_qid_by_mspi 0&lt;/STRONG&gt; but this doesn't change anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As we have upgraded from R80.30, should we enable prioq which is disabled at the moment?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95905#M8744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T09:04:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95906#M8745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14307"&gt;@Ilya_Yusupov&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@fw-inet-02:0]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond1&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation&lt;BR /&gt;Transmit Hash Policy: layer3+4 (1)&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;MII Polling Interval (ms): 100&lt;BR /&gt;Up Delay (ms): 200&lt;BR /&gt;Down Delay (ms): 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;802.3ad info&lt;BR /&gt;LACP rate: slow&lt;BR /&gt;Min links: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable&lt;BR /&gt;System priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d8&lt;BR /&gt;Active Aggregator Info:&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Number of ports: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Key: 32773&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Mac Address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 10000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d8&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d8&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 1&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32667&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 32773&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 261&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth3-01&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 10000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 4&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:66:42:1f&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d8&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 2&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32667&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 32773&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 16645&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@fw-inet-02:0]#&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@fw-inet-02:0]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond2&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation&lt;BR /&gt;Transmit Hash Policy: layer3+4 (1)&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;MII Polling Interval (ms): 100&lt;BR /&gt;Up Delay (ms): 200&lt;BR /&gt;Down Delay (ms): 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;802.3ad info&lt;BR /&gt;LACP rate: slow&lt;BR /&gt;Min links: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable&lt;BR /&gt;System priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d9&lt;BR /&gt;Active Aggregator Info:&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Number of ports: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Key: 32782&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Mac Address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-02&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 10000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d9&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d9&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 1&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32667&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 32782&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 270&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth3-02&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 10000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 3&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:66:42:20&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:66:69:d9&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 15&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 2&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32667&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:23:04:ee:be:02&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 32782&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 16654&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95906#M8745</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T09:05:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95928#M8747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21670"&gt;@HeikoAnkenbrand&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your response. But why are only 2 MQ-Cores at high CPU. The other ones are &amp;lt;20%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95928#M8747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T09:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95937#M8748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We changed mulitqueue to 12 cores. Now the 2 High CPUs are at 70%, the other ones stay at &amp;lt; 20%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LACP is configured as src-ip-dst on the Cisco Nexus switches and Layer3+4 on Checkpoint.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95937#M8748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Kleinhans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T10:31:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95986#M8749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21737"&gt;@Jan_Kleinhans&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i will contact you offline for further investigation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/95986#M8749</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Yusupov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T14:27:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.40 High CPU usage on snd cores</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/107296#M14363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, was there ever a fix for this issue? I'm facing a situation now where a R80.40 Take 89 VSX is having 1 SND always around 100% and others around 10%.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-40-High-CPU-usage-on-snd-cores/m-p/107296#M14363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-08T13:22:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

