<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unable to display NAT table on busy VS on R80.40 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/99925#M8696</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here comes the "follow-up" from our VSX upgrade last night.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One of the busy VSes that does a lot o NAT (relatively speaking) fails to display NAT table. We are on R80.40 T78&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;fw tab -t fwx_alloc -s
HOST                  NAME                                ID #VALS #PEAK #SLINKS
 Failed to get table status for fwx_alloc
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other VSes are OK actually.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone else seen this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-23T06:36:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unable to display NAT table on busy VS on R80.40</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/99925#M8696</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here comes the "follow-up" from our VSX upgrade last night.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One of the busy VSes that does a lot o NAT (relatively speaking) fails to display NAT table. We are on R80.40 T78&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;fw tab -t fwx_alloc -s
HOST                  NAME                                ID #VALS #PEAK #SLINKS
 Failed to get table status for fwx_alloc
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other VSes are OK actually.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone else seen this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/99925#M8696</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T06:36:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to display NAT table on busy VS on R80.40</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/99949#M8697</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Case closed!&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk156852&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=SmartLog," target="_self"&gt;sk156852&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;the only way to see NAT is cpview&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/99949#M8697</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T12:02:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to display NAT table on busy VS on R80.40</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/100072#M8698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Guessing the NAT tables are different in recent versions due to the NAT pool improvements in R80.40 (and JHF in other releases).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 23:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-display-NAT-table-on-busy-VS-on-R80-40/m-p/100072#M8698</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-24T23:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

