<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SmartEvent Smart-1 appliance sizing information? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49477#M86790</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if there are any recent SmartEvent sizing recommendations posted somewhere?&amp;nbsp; All I can find is the document below that is for R77.x and the old Smart-1 models.&amp;nbsp; We currently run a Smart-1 225 and I can't turn on the consolidated sessions setting to report on the firewall blade because it pretty much brings the appliance to its knees when I have that running.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking to replace with a 525, 5050, or open server on my own hardware and given how much these appliances cost I want to be sure I am buying a new SmartEvent appliance that will easily be able to handle my logs with the consolidated sessions setting turned on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, was certain I remembered a support engineer telling me a while back that once you had mgmt and gateways running R80.10+ you could report on the firewall blade in SmartEvent without having the full consolidated sessions turned on.&amp;nbsp; That does not seem to be the case, and I put in a ticket and they said you can only get this with consolidated sessions.&amp;nbsp; If anyone knows of a way to report on the firewall blade without the huge performance hit of consolidated sessions please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk87263" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk87263&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Travis_Krings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-01T15:17:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SmartEvent Smart-1 appliance sizing information?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49477#M86790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if there are any recent SmartEvent sizing recommendations posted somewhere?&amp;nbsp; All I can find is the document below that is for R77.x and the old Smart-1 models.&amp;nbsp; We currently run a Smart-1 225 and I can't turn on the consolidated sessions setting to report on the firewall blade because it pretty much brings the appliance to its knees when I have that running.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking to replace with a 525, 5050, or open server on my own hardware and given how much these appliances cost I want to be sure I am buying a new SmartEvent appliance that will easily be able to handle my logs with the consolidated sessions setting turned on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, was certain I remembered a support engineer telling me a while back that once you had mgmt and gateways running R80.10+ you could report on the firewall blade in SmartEvent without having the full consolidated sessions turned on.&amp;nbsp; That does not seem to be the case, and I put in a ticket and they said you can only get this with consolidated sessions.&amp;nbsp; If anyone knows of a way to report on the firewall blade without the huge performance hit of consolidated sessions please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk87263" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk87263&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49477#M86790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Travis_Krings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T15:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SmartEvent Smart-1 appliance sizing information?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49497#M86791</link>
      <description>The way we size Smart-1 Appliances these days is "logs per second."&lt;BR /&gt;There's a couple different metrics here: sustained logs per second and burst.&lt;BR /&gt;You can see this on the datasheet:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.checkpoint.com/downloads/products/smart-1-security-management-platform-datasheet.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.checkpoint.com/downloads/products/smart-1-security-management-platform-datasheet.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, older Smart-1 appliances with R80.x have this information in the following SK: &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk112797" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk112797&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The SK you linked has the CPLogInvestigator tool in it, which can tell you how much logs you're actually processing right now.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for running reports on consolidated firewall sessions, there is a certain amount of correlation that happens without full consolidated sessions.&lt;BR /&gt;What is it you're looking to report on specifically in this case?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 22:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49497#M86791</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T22:10:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SmartEvent Smart-1 appliance sizing information?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49726#M86792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the information.&amp;nbsp; What I'm looking to do is be able to run reports and get data from the firewall blade.&amp;nbsp; Since we don't have a tool like Firemon these reports were very helpful to look at a specific rule and narrow down what is allowed, building up new rules, etc.&amp;nbsp; I don't necessarily need full correlation, just the ability to get reports on the firewall blade logs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 14:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49726#M86792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Travis_Krings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-03T14:51:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SmartEvent Smart-1 appliance sizing information?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49727#M86793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently in my SmartEvent console the statistics/status window tells me the recommended events per day is 1.3M, and we are already at 1.7M with no consolidated sessions turned on.&amp;nbsp; If I turn on consolidated sessions it seems that they tell me to expect a 5x increase in events per day.&amp;nbsp; We are replacing this with a new Smart-1 appliance, so I want to make sure I size it properly so that I can also report on firewall logs even if that means I have to turn on consolidated sessions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 14:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SmartEvent-Smart-1-appliance-sizing-information/m-p/49727#M86793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Travis_Krings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-03T14:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

