<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12703#M855</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are performing 4 Common Criteria certifications:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. EAL4+ R77.30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. EAL4+ of R80.xx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. NDcPP based evaluation of R80.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. NDcPP for the high end including 44K/64K&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ and NDcPP are to satisfy different markets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDcPP is primarily requested in the US, Canada, Australia/New Zealand and the UK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ is requested in&amp;nbsp; Germany and some other countries&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are countries where either standard is accepted, and this sometimes depends upon the requesting agency.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ is the traditional Common Criteria standard and requires much effort in developing a complete set of design and assurance evidence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDcPP is essentially a formalized set of back box tests defined as part of a Protection Profile for a technology type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EAL4+ In Evaluation listing for R77.30 is shown here: &lt;A href="https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en"&gt;https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EAL4+ for R80.xx should be listed&amp;nbsp; by the BSI in the very near future (we after the official kick-off meeting)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Projects are subject to change during the evaluations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Letters attesting to these commitments are available upon request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Malcolm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-18T20:05:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12701#M853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any information on&amp;nbsp;Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no info here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.checkpoint.com/products-solutions/certified-check-point-solutions/" title="https://www.checkpoint.com/products-solutions/certified-check-point-solutions/"&gt;Certified Check Point Solutions | Check Point Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;regards&amp;nbsp;anything beyond R77.30.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone with info regards implied compliance or an ETA on a statement would be most welcomed. I appreciate that sometimes these statements come someway behind release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12701#M853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan_Pitt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T12:03:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12702#M854</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, these certifications take some time to complete and we only typically post official notice once the product has achieved the relevant certification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll see what I can find out, but I'm not sure what I can say publicly about it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your account team may be able to tell you more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 00:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12702#M854</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-18T00:55:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12703#M855</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are performing 4 Common Criteria certifications:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. EAL4+ R77.30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. EAL4+ of R80.xx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. NDcPP based evaluation of R80.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. NDcPP for the high end including 44K/64K&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ and NDcPP are to satisfy different markets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDcPP is primarily requested in the US, Canada, Australia/New Zealand and the UK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ is requested in&amp;nbsp; Germany and some other countries&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are countries where either standard is accepted, and this sometimes depends upon the requesting agency.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EAL4+ is the traditional Common Criteria standard and requires much effort in developing a complete set of design and assurance evidence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDcPP is essentially a formalized set of back box tests defined as part of a Protection Profile for a technology type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EAL4+ In Evaluation listing for R77.30 is shown here: &lt;A href="https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en"&gt;https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EAL4+ for R80.xx should be listed&amp;nbsp; by the BSI in the very near future (we after the official kick-off meeting)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Projects are subject to change during the evaluations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Letters attesting to these commitments are available upon request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Malcolm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12703#M855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-18T20:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12704#M856</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have updated the projects as follows. The link for 1 and 2 are the official the In_Evaluation listing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 14px;"&gt;1. EAL4+ R77.30&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en" title="https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en"&gt;https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=319&amp;amp;Itemid=131&amp;amp;lang=en&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 14px;"&gt;2. EAL4+ of R80.20&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Topics/Certification/incertification.html" title="https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Topics/Certification/incertification.html"&gt;BSI - Certification - Products / systems, which are in evaluation / certification&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 14px;"&gt;3. NDcPP based evaluation of R80.20 - not yet listed as pre-kickoff&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 14px;"&gt;4. NDcPP for the high end including 44K/64K -&lt;SPAN&gt;not yet listed as pre-kickoff&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12704#M856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-14T12:24:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12705#M857</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the EAL4 of R77.30 link looks to be problematic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is another&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php/en/certified-products/certified-products/status/49-evaluation/295-check-point-software-technologies-ltd-security-appliances-with-security-management-and-security-gateway-r77-30-on-gaia"&gt;https://oc.ccn.cni.es/index.php/en/certified-products/certified-products/status/49-evaluation/295-check-point-software-technologies-ltd-security-appliances-with-security-management-and-security-gateway-r77-30-on-gaia&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For this project is progressing. The lab is here in Israel validating the site, security and procedures&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 08:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12705#M857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-04T08:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12706#M858</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see that the In Evaluation listing for R80.20 being performed in Germany through the BSI is shown on the 2nd page of this link as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Topics/Certification/incertification.html?nn=6650938&amp;amp;cms_gtp=6650840_unnamed%253D2"&gt;https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Topics/Certification/incertification.html?nn=6650938&amp;amp;cms_gtp=6650840_unnamed%253D2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE style="background: white;" width="945"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="border: none; border-bottom: dotted #7F7F7F 1.0pt; padding: 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 15.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #393f46;"&gt;BSI-DSZ-CC-1054&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: none; border-bottom: dotted #7F7F7F 1.0pt; padding: 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 15.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #393f46;"&gt;Check Point Security Gateway and Security Management R80.xx Firmware for Security Gateway, Firewall, VPN, Security Management Server, and GAiA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: none; border-bottom: dotted #7F7F7F 1.0pt; padding: 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 15.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #393f46;"&gt;Check Point Software Technologies Ltd&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: none; border-bottom: dotted #7F7F7F 1.0pt; padding: 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 15.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #393f46;"&gt;Network Device Additional information: Product in evaluation&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:52:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12706#M858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-14T08:52:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12707#M859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;We have now officially commenced the cPP evaluation for R80.20 through NIAP-CCEVS. We are claiming FW, VPN, IPS and NSA CSFC compliance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;The In_Evaluation listing shown below is linked at: &lt;A href="https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Product/PINE.cfm"&gt;https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Product/PINE.cfm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;The NSA CSFC listing will be here &lt;A href="https://www.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/csfc/components-list/#ipsec-vpn-gateway"&gt;https://www.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/csfc/components-list/#ipsec-vpn-gateway&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;Malcolm&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;THEAD&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="border: solid white 1.0pt; background: #80B3EE; padding: 3.0pt 6.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;" width="518"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000028; font-size: 8.0pt;"&gt;Product&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: solid white 1.0pt; background: #80B3EE; padding: 3.0pt 6.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;" width="65"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000028; font-size: 8.0pt;"&gt;VID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: solid white 1.0pt; background: #80B3EE; padding: 3.0pt 6.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;" width="248"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000028; font-size: 8.0pt;"&gt;Conformance Claim&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: solid white 1.0pt; background: #80B3EE; padding: 3.0pt 6.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;" width="156"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000028; font-size: 8.0pt;"&gt;CCTL&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="border: solid white 1.0pt; background: #242472; padding: 3.0pt 6.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;" width="119"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: white; font-size: 8.0pt;"&gt;Kickoff Date&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/THEAD&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="background: white; padding: 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style=": ; color: #000006; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10.0pt;"&gt;Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #000006;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Security Gateway and Sandblast Appliances, CloudGuard R80.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="background: white; padding: 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #000006;"&gt;10942&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="background: white; padding: 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #000006;"&gt;·&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Profile/Info.cfm?PPID=423&amp;amp;id=423"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #242472; text-decoration: none;"&gt;CPP_FW_V2.0E&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; ·&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Profile/Info.cfm?PPID=416&amp;amp;id=416"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #242472; text-decoration: none;"&gt;EP_IPS_V2.11&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; ·&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Profile/Info.cfm?PPID=411&amp;amp;id=411"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #242472; text-decoration: none;"&gt;EP_VPN_GW_V2.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="background: white; padding: 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #000006;"&gt;Gossamer Security Solutions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="background: white; padding: 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt 3.0pt;"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 7.5pt 0in 11.25pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #000006;"&gt;2018.10.30&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12707#M859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm_Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-01T06:49:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12708#M860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is great news.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:02:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/12708#M860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-21T05:02:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/63683#M4869</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do we have any updated info for EAL4+ complaince of for R80.30 or R80.x ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/63683#M4869</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fatih_Ergul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-25T19:38:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/71917#M5481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;certified:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://commoncriteriaportal.org/files/epfiles/Certification%20Report%20NSCIB-CC-19-0046947-CR.pdf" target="_self"&gt;Certification Report&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/71917#M5481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matthias_Haas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-09T09:51:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Common Criteria EAL4+ compliance for R80.10?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/72532#M5518</link>
      <description>Hi, we now have Common Criteria certification for R80.30.&lt;BR /&gt;See details here: &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Enterprise-Appliances-and-Gaia/2-new-Common-Criteria-certificates-R80-30-Protection-Profile-and/m-p/72441#M5512" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Enterprise-Appliances-and-Gaia/2-new-Common-Criteria-certificates-R80-30-Protection-Profile-and/m-p/72441#M5512&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:08:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Common-Criteria-EAL4-compliance-for-R80-10/m-p/72532#M5518</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T12:08:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

