<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using Different Cluster Interfaces in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103153#M8136</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ooow, I didn't see that in the Advanced tab!&amp;nbsp; Perfect thanks, I'll give that a try.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>biskit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-24T15:31:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Different Cluster Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/102971#M8110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In versions of old, you could specify interfaces per cluster member.&amp;nbsp; This allowed me in the past to easily overcome a faulty NIC by moving one member to a different NIC and just updating the topology for that single member.&amp;nbsp; I've done it a few times and it worked a treat!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now that option appears to have gone.&amp;nbsp; I have a cluster member that has developed a faulty eth0, so I want to move that cable to the spare eth6 which is proven working.&amp;nbsp; When I do this the member stays "down" because the cluster is expecting to see eth0 up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way these days to keep eth0 on one member and eth6 on the other member, like I could in the past?&amp;nbsp; Otherwise I have to schedule a downtime window to change both gateways to eth6, and go on-site to install the policy from the 'inside'...&amp;nbsp; It turns a 2 minute remote job (albeit with remote hands to re-patch the cable) with no downtime into a fully blown scheduled outage with a site visit, which is a royal pain in the..... and a step backwards from what we could once do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/102971#M8110</guid>
      <dc:creator>biskit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-23T12:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Different Cluster Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103053#M8117</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Matt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disable your faulty nic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configure your alternative interface with the correct IP details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit the cluster interface on the object, go to advanced and change the relevant interface parameters shown in the screenshot! - download below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.e member a -eth0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;member b - eth6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Push policy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103053#M8117</guid>
      <dc:creator>JackPrendergast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-23T20:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Different Cluster Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103153#M8136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ooow, I didn't see that in the Advanced tab!&amp;nbsp; Perfect thanks, I'll give that a try.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103153#M8136</guid>
      <dc:creator>biskit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-24T15:31:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Different Cluster Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103159#M8137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No problem. Please 'accept as solution' to close this thread!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Different-Cluster-Interfaces/m-p/103159#M8137</guid>
      <dc:creator>JackPrendergast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-24T16:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

