<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN with third Party Device and supernetting in Firewall &amp; Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96442#M78490</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk108600: VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk122478&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk122478: 3rd party VPN peer rejects IDs proposed in IKE phase 2 and tunnel not established (unless initiated from peer side)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk144094&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk144094: VPN tunnels with 3rd party peers fail because of mismatched IDs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk88780&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Security" target="_blank"&gt;sk88780: Troubleshooting "No valid SA" error&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk104760&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk104760: ATRG: VPN Core&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-10T08:21:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN with third Party Device and supernetting</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96428#M78489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a question about VPN site-to-site between Check Point and third party devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My version is R80.30 Take 215.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As such, the VPN tunnel works, the peer customer complains about strange Phase2 connection attempts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the source IP address is not stored on the Check Point in the VPN domain on my site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The technician suspects subneting at the check point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found out the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ike_enable_supernet = false&lt;BR /&gt;ike_use_largest_possible_subnets = true&lt;BR /&gt;ike_p2_enable_supernet_from_R80.20 = by_global&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure whether the Check Point makes a supernetting of the VPN domain networks.&lt;BR /&gt;Can someone tell me based on these three settings whether the check point makes a supernetting of the networks in the VPN domain?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I also find strange is that I see via "vpn tu tlist" that my WAN VIP is trying to initiate a phase2 tunnel,&lt;BR /&gt;in addition to the three existing phase 2 tunnels , the tunnel does not come Up because the peer does not allow it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your support&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96428#M78489</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikolai_Borhart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T07:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN with third Party Device and supernetting</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96442#M78490</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk108600: VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk122478&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk122478: 3rd party VPN peer rejects IDs proposed in IKE phase 2 and tunnel not established (unless initiated from peer side)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk144094&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk144094: VPN tunnels with 3rd party peers fail because of mismatched IDs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk88780&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Security" target="_blank"&gt;sk88780: Troubleshooting "No valid SA" error&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk104760&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;sk104760: ATRG: VPN Core&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96442#M78490</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T08:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN with third Party Device and supernetting</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96562#M78491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've checked it all out and I'm still unsure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question here is. Does the R80.30 Take 215 make summery subnetting in a VPN site-to-site between check point and third party device?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96562#M78491</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikolai_Borhart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-11T10:49:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN with third Party Device and supernetting</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96571#M78492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk108600: VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;: Check Point Security Gateway dynamically supernets subnets to reduce the amount of SA overhead - this happens always.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96571#M78492</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-11T12:50:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN with third Party Device and supernetting</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96622#M78493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ike_use_largest_possible_subnets = true&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That’s one of the settings that controls superneting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2020 19:37:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/VPN-with-third-Party-Device-and-supernetting/m-p/96622#M78493</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-12T19:37:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

