<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PrioQ on Dual core platforms in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99969#M7801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As I stated in my book, 2-core firewalls are between a bit of a rock and a hard place.&amp;nbsp; The only documentation I've seen for variable fwmultik_sync_processing_enabled being set to 0 states that "This limits the CPU to handle fewer stack functions simultaneously.. ".&amp;nbsp; The other related kernel parameters are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;fwmultik_sync_processing_limited = 0&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;fwmultik_sync_processing_max = 2048&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess setting&amp;nbsp;fwmultik_sync_processing_enabled to 0 limits parallel processing or CPU monopolization by a Firewall Worker?&amp;nbsp; Not really sure...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are the relevant pages from my book covering how to handle 2-core firewalls:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2cores1.png" style="width: 781px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8568iA32A0B56CAAA873C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2cores1.png" alt="2cores1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2cores2.png" style="width: 785px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8569iAAB78F03406BAFF4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2cores2.png" alt="2cores2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-23T13:55:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PrioQ on Dual core platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99873#M7798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have been considering enabling PrioQ on an appliance that suffers from spikes from time to time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Reading PrioQ SK came across the following limitation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Dual core limitation" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8554iBAF6808038F6B622/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="Dual core limitation" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Dual core limitation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is this queue? is it safe to disable?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, is it not a better core disposition 1 SND and 1 FW for dual core platforms?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What's your take?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99873#M7798</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-22T16:05:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PrioQ on Dual core platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99969#M7801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I stated in my book, 2-core firewalls are between a bit of a rock and a hard place.&amp;nbsp; The only documentation I've seen for variable fwmultik_sync_processing_enabled being set to 0 states that "This limits the CPU to handle fewer stack functions simultaneously.. ".&amp;nbsp; The other related kernel parameters are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;fwmultik_sync_processing_limited = 0&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;fwmultik_sync_processing_max = 2048&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess setting&amp;nbsp;fwmultik_sync_processing_enabled to 0 limits parallel processing or CPU monopolization by a Firewall Worker?&amp;nbsp; Not really sure...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are the relevant pages from my book covering how to handle 2-core firewalls:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2cores1.png" style="width: 781px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8568iA32A0B56CAAA873C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2cores1.png" alt="2cores1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2cores2.png" style="width: 785px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8569iAAB78F03406BAFF4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2cores2.png" alt="2cores2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99969#M7801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T13:55:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PrioQ on Dual core platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99971#M7802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Tim!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Got your book recently from Shadowpeak. Great read &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will probably consult the TAC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PrioQ-on-Dual-core-platforms/m-p/99971#M7802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T14:02:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

