<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98497#M7663</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Believe the older Linux kernel supports a maximum of 5 interfaces with multiqueue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:23:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-08T04:23:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98464#M7655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was trying to add two more MQ cores to my 23800 VSX cluster (10&amp;gt;12) but after increasing &lt;STRONG&gt;ixgbe&lt;/STRONG&gt; core count and reboot, one of 5 interfaces that had MQ configured before would remain on "Pending ON" state&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;cpmq set rx_num ixgbe 12&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@vsx:0]# cpmq get -a

Active ixgbe interfaces:
eth2-01 [On]
eth2-02 [Off]
eth2-03 [On]
eth2-04 [Pending On]
eth3-01 [On]
eth3-02 [On]

Non-Active ixgbe interfaces:
eth4-01 [Off]
eth4-02 [Off]
eth4-03 [Off]
eth4-04 [Off]
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;even it says clearly that &lt;STRONG&gt;ixgbe&lt;/STRONG&gt; should support 16 cores in the performance tuning admin guide&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 765px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8307i813C70DBBF9D4980/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But then from command line it shows 10!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@vsx:0]# cpmq get rx_num ixgbe
The rx_num for ixgbe is: 10
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ouch! Anyone knows if I can get more than 10 on 2.16 kernel R80.30? Is it a bug or wrong documentation&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just noticed that there is override option, has anyone tried it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="2020-10-07_21-08-13.jpg" style="width: 770px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8308i32FAC24D06D3436B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2020-10-07_21-08-13.jpg" alt="2020-10-07_21-08-13.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98464#M7655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T19:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98468#M7656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, -f did not help so I suspect since this is non HT system with total of 24 cores there must be some calculation in place that limits max cores for ixgbe MQ to 10..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98468#M7656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T20:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98476#M7657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The driver-based max limit for ixgbe is 16 queues, but Multi-Queue is partially implemented by the underlying NIC hardware which can have lower limits.&amp;nbsp; As an example the igb driver theoretically supports up to 8 queues, but if the underlying NIC hardware is I211 (onboard interfaces for 3200,&amp;nbsp; 5000, 6500, 15000, 23000) it can only have a maximum of two parallel queues per interface.&amp;nbsp; I suspect this is why you can't go beyond 10 queues in your case and attempting to go higher fails, which leads to the persistent "Pending On" state.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98476#M7657</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T20:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98497#M7663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Believe the older Linux kernel supports a maximum of 5 interfaces with multiqueue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:23:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98497#M7663</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T04:23:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unable to set MQ on more than 10 cores R80.30 T215 2.16 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98502#M7665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yap, that's correct, but I wanted to add a bit more horse power to SND on those five as we were suffering from voice quality in teams due to very bursty nature of traffic. CPU (60%) and interface utilisation (25%) all looked good but we still saw 0.18% RX-DRP on some of the interfaces. Increased RX ring buffers to MAX and it helped a little initially. But then as Tim has been suggesting back in March adding more SND cores may help even though they do not report 100% utilisation. So we went from 8 &amp;gt; 10 MQ cores first and that showed massive improvement in RX-DRP.&amp;nbsp; Since I was able to free up more cores in VSX, I wanted to go all the way to 12 but run to this limitation. So next step is 3.10 which was not available back in March for 23800 appliances &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My old reference&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/VSX/RX-DRP-rx-missed-errors-on-VSX-23800-R80-30-with-mltiqueue/td-p/79802" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/VSX/RX-DRP-rx-missed-errors-on-VSX-23800-R80-30-with-mltiqueue/td-p/79802&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:59:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Unable-to-set-MQ-on-more-than-10-cores-R80-30-T215-2-16-kernel/m-p/98502#M7665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T04:59:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

