<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MTU issue in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130139#M74419</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Checkmates...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently 20 GWs&amp;nbsp; managed with single management Server R81 on VM in our Setup. Considering business&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;criticality, We plan to build redundant management&amp;nbsp; server in other business unit and the same has been done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the problem starts as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While Sync the backup file from primary to DR&amp;nbsp; location:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I) never sync completes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Drop the session due to time-out error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Slow data transfer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So we are struggling and unable to build secondary management server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check point Team telling MTU issue with ISP,but ISP refusing the MTU issue because of file transfer between other than management is server is normal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please share your ideas and&amp;nbsp; views on this if anybody come across this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advance thanks..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simply_sachin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-24T08:57:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130139#M74419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Checkmates...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently 20 GWs&amp;nbsp; managed with single management Server R81 on VM in our Setup. Considering business&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;criticality, We plan to build redundant management&amp;nbsp; server in other business unit and the same has been done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the problem starts as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While Sync the backup file from primary to DR&amp;nbsp; location:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I) never sync completes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Drop the session due to time-out error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Slow data transfer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So we are struggling and unable to build secondary management server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check point Team telling MTU issue with ISP,but ISP refusing the MTU issue because of file transfer between other than management is server is normal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please share your ideas and&amp;nbsp; views on this if anybody come across this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advance thanks..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130139#M74419</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simply_sachin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-24T08:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130161#M74420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An MTU issue should be easily shown with pings and df-set from any machine not just the Check Point Mgmt, also is there a VPN involved?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130161#M74420</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-24T11:59:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130165#M74421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What Jumbo HFA level are you using for R81?&amp;nbsp; There have been many, many Management HA stability and performance fixes in those.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also R81.10 claims to have significant Management HA sync performance and stability fixes; it is not clear whether only some of or all of these improvements have been back-ported into the R81 Jumbo HFAs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130165#M74421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-24T12:10:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130203#M74422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Put it this way, so you can consider your options...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on past experience, it is known that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;larger MTU sizes typically provide better overall performance than smaller MTU&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;sizes. Larger MTU sizes reduce the number of packets needed to transfer a large amount of data. ... In general, using fewer packets typically reduces the overhead and improves overall performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130203#M74422</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-24T15:41:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130237#M74423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Also need to consider an MTU mismatch (fragmentation).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 01:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130237#M74423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-25T01:24:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTU issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130242#M74424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes sir, thats a very good point...indeed, fragmentation can affect VPN performance big time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MTU-issue/m-p/130242#M74424</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-25T11:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

