<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Public IP Ranges with NAT in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178470#M68670</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you able to share more details of the scenario?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps this can be addressed in combination with using strategically placed no-NAT rules for instance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk97246: Is it possible to add Group with Exclusions to the NAT rule base?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-19T11:50:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Public IP Ranges with NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178462#M68669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have come across an issue where I wanted to implement a NAT rule in Smartdasboard (R80.40) with the destination being a Public IP range i.e. None RFC 1918 ranges.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only option I had as an object was "All Internet" which also covers the RFC1918 addresses. Do Checkpoint have an object that would exclude the RFC1918 addresses and include the Internet ranges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178462#M68669</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlackBinNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T11:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Public IP Ranges with NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178470#M68670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you able to share more details of the scenario?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps this can be addressed in combination with using strategically placed no-NAT rules for instance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk97246: Is it possible to add Group with Exclusions to the NAT rule base?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178470#M68670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T11:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Public IP Ranges with NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178474#M68671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have implemented a work around using no-NAT but was interested to see if there was a specific group that only included non RFC1918 IP's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will most certainly look into the sk97246 method to see if that helps with my question.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178474#M68671</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlackBinNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T11:58:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Public IP Ranges with NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178667#M68672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, there isn't a single non-group object that excludes RFC-1918 but includes everything else.&lt;BR /&gt;Several "NO NAT" rules are the way to go here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:11:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Public-IP-Ranges-with-NAT/m-p/178667#M68672</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T00:11:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

