<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57929#M6591</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Heiko as long as you have all those configuration elements matching (indicated with ok!) my gut is that it will work fine as I don't see how ClusterXL would be able to freak out over any other differences.&amp;nbsp; Definitely not supported though...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-10T15:33:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57877#M6580</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our customers has a failure in the hardware of a ClusterXL gateway. He wants to use a new server HP DL 380 &lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;G10&lt;/FONT&gt; with an old server HP DL 380 &lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;G8&lt;/FONT&gt;. The idea now is to use a new 3.10 kernel on the G10 server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now the question?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use a 2.6 kernel on the HP DL 380 G8 and a new kernel 3.10 on the HP DL 380 G10 in a ClusterXL?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:09:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57877#M6580</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:09:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57878#M6581</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check Point's &lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/161106.htm#o160060" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;ClusterXL Admin Guide&lt;/A&gt; says:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12px; margin: 6pt 0cm; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Important!&lt;/STRONG&gt; The hardware for all cluster members must be exactly the same, including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: medium; margin-top: 4pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; text-indent: 0cm; font-size: 12px; margin: 4pt 0cm 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;CPU&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; text-indent: 0cm; font-size: 12px; margin: 4pt 0cm 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;Motherboard&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; text-indent: 0cm; font-size: 12px; margin: 4pt 0cm 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;Memory&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; text-indent: 0cm; font-size: 12px; margin: 4pt 0cm 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;Number and type of interfaces&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you can't configure a Cluster consisting of two different servers. At least not one that is supported.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57878#M6581</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:17:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57879#M6582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My feeling was more like no!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57879#M6582</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57884#M6583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/687"&gt;@Danny&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you test that?&lt;BR /&gt;Does it work without any problems?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The customer also orders a new second G10 server. We would only do this for a few days.&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face:"&gt;😀&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think the ClusterXL version should be identical on 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel. Thus, the requirements for a cluster should be met.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The interesting question is the support of this combination.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If need be, I'd rather have a statement here from Check Point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:32:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57884#M6583</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:32:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57885#M6584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;CUT&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Important! The hardware for all cluster members must be exactly the same, including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU&lt;BR /&gt;Motherboard&lt;BR /&gt;Memory&lt;BR /&gt;Number and type of interfaces&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;CUT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you, I know. But had already received other statements in tickets from Check Point.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57885#M6584</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:27:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57886#M6585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The admin guide clearly states 'the hardware must be &lt;STRONG&gt;exactly&lt;/STRONG&gt; the same‘ and yours is a G8 and a G10 server, so I think it‘s clear that this wouldn‘t be supported.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57886#M6585</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57887#M6586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Like I said, I know that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We just need to bridge a few days until the new server arrives:-)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57887#M6586</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:36:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57890#M6587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, then test it out and let us know.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57890#M6587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57892#M6588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CUT&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Important! The hardware for all cluster members must be exactly the same, including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU&lt;BR /&gt;Motherboard&lt;BR /&gt;Memory&lt;BR /&gt;Number and type of interfaces&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;CUT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regardless of this request we could discuss these parameters in another post.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From my point of view only a few parameters are technically interesting in a ClusterXL environment:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU -&amp;gt; Equal number of cores -&amp;gt; Sync core number (CoreXL) of a session from one session tabel (active gw) to the standby sessin table (standby gw) =&amp;gt; ok!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Memory -&amp;gt; should be equal =&amp;gt; ok!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Network Interfaces -&amp;gt; same number of used interfaces in cluster =&amp;gt; ok!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Motherdoard -&amp;gt; ??? why should it be the same?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But as I said, that should be discussed in another post.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57892#M6588</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T11:03:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57893#M6589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm going to try this in a maintenance window:-)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just has to run until the new hardware arrives.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57893#M6589</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T11:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57894#M6590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please pay attention to the word: &lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;including&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point posted just a short listing of hardware devices, not a complete list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57894#M6590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T12:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57929#M6591</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Heiko as long as you have all those configuration elements matching (indicated with ok!) my gut is that it will work fine as I don't see how ClusterXL would be able to freak out over any other differences.&amp;nbsp; Definitely not supported though...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/57929#M6591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T15:33:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/58219#M6592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21670"&gt;@HeikoAnkenbrand&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and all, motherboard is important because of chipset. Most importantly, the proposed configuration will not be supported.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To the topic starter, as mentioned above, you cannot run such a cluster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/58219#M6592</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T06:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85108#M6593</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Timothy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've a cluster on two identical Dell power edge servers running R80.30 on 2.6. I want to upgrade them to use R80.30 3.10. During the upgrade window which will likely last few days, the cluster members will be running different OS kernel version. I don't think this will be an issue but given the current context with COVID 19&amp;nbsp; if things go south most likely&amp;nbsp; i'll follow too &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 20:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85108#M6593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurpeus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-13T20:39:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85266#M6594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think the cluster members will be able to sync at all with the different kernels but I'm not sure.&amp;nbsp; You may want to temporarily uncheck "Drop out of state TCP packets" on the Stateful Inspection screen of Global Properties until everything is fully upgraded.&amp;nbsp; Doing this will help blunt the impact of any&amp;nbsp; non-stateful failovers that occur.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 14:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85266#M6594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-14T14:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85278#M6595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, not supported, will not work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 14:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85278#M6595</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-14T14:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85295#M6596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a difference between not supported and will not work. I can do with a cluster not supported for few days.&amp;nbsp; Now if the cluster doesn't work that's a different story&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 15:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85295#M6596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurpeus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-14T15:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85306#M6597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm desperately in need for multi queue so i'll give it a try a report back. Thanks for the tip about out of state TCP packets that's a very good point.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I forgot to mention , to make matter worse, atm my cluster is running on VmWare and during the upgrade one member will run on VmWare while the other one is re-imaged on bare metal.&amp;nbsp; ClusterXL may go mental&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway we only live once &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 16:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85306#M6597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurpeus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-14T16:45:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85331#M6598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Not supported.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Will not work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 19:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85331#M6598</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-14T19:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.30 ClusterXL with 2.6 kernel and 3.10 kernel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85344#M6599</link>
      <description>Right, but you can potentially put R80.40 on the new box which does support clustering with different versions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 01:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-30-ClusterXL-with-2-6-kernel-and-3-10-kernel/m-p/85344#M6599</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-15T01:29:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

