<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS in Firewall &amp; Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261606#M61374</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hyper-V also definitely works. Some older CloudGuard images seem to think any Hyper-V host is Azure, but installing from ISO always works, and newer CloudGuard images work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I haven't had time to try FreeBSD/illumos' &lt;A href="https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/virtualization/#virtualization-host-bhyve" target="_self"&gt;bhyve&lt;/A&gt; or OpenBSD's &lt;A href="https://man.openbsd.org/vmd" target="_self"&gt;vmd(8)&lt;/A&gt;. The former is very likely to work. I suspect the latter would take substantial effort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;VirtualBox works, but it's mediocre all around.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-31T19:26:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261485#M61367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Upto now I've always used VMware as my hypervisor of choice for building gateways and management servers in my lab, however with the current direction that Broadcom are taking VMware I think it's time for a change. My initial thought was Proxmox, and I see on here people are using this without issue, but I was wondering if anyone has ever tried installing gateways and SMS on Unraid as the hypervisor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261485#M61367</guid>
      <dc:creator>StevePearson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-30T21:32:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261506#M61368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I personally always use eve-ng, its the BEST...just my opinion. But, to answer your question, I know customer that did use Unraid and they said was fine, no issues,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261506#M61368</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-30T23:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261510#M61369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Promox, Unraid, and even&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/38213"&gt;@the_rock&lt;/a&gt;'s favorite EVE-NG all use KVM under the hood.&lt;BR /&gt;Which means it should work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261510#M61369</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-30T23:58:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261513#M61370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Anyone I showed eve-ng to LOVED it, just saying.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261513#M61370</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T00:01:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261602#M61371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Andy, never come across this but looks pretty impressive, so that's my weekend sorted, plying with a new toy!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261602#M61371</guid>
      <dc:creator>StevePearson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T18:04:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261603#M61372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im telling you, its GREAT!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261603#M61372</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T18:13:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261604#M61373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Personally, even if yearly license was 1000$, I would still argue its worth it, and its about 300, so thats worth it every penny, in my humble opinion &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261604#M61373</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T18:20:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261606#M61374</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hyper-V also definitely works. Some older CloudGuard images seem to think any Hyper-V host is Azure, but installing from ISO always works, and newer CloudGuard images work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I haven't had time to try FreeBSD/illumos' &lt;A href="https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/virtualization/#virtualization-host-bhyve" target="_self"&gt;bhyve&lt;/A&gt; or OpenBSD's &lt;A href="https://man.openbsd.org/vmd" target="_self"&gt;vmd(8)&lt;/A&gt;. The former is very likely to work. I suspect the latter would take substantial effort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;VirtualBox works, but it's mediocre all around.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/261606#M61374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T19:26:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262276#M61375</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;eve-ng caused a lot of disk corruption into my checkpoint qemu vms in my experience&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;now happy with gns3&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262276#M61375</guid>
      <dc:creator>CheckPointerXL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-09T23:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262277#M61376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Never had issue personally.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:30:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262277#M61376</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-09T23:30:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hypervisors for running gateways and SMS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262293#M61377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hyper-V definitely works.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/Hypervisors-for-running-gateways-and-SMS/m-p/262293#M61377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ingard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-10T08:20:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

