<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ClusterXL none monitored interface in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76902#M5913</link>
    <description>Officially, you have to contact the TAC to get the solution, per:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk139252" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk139252&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why it was removed from the UI, I’m not sure.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-02T18:37:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ClusterXL none monitored interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76848#M5909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;there was a possibility in R77.30 to define a ClusterXL interface as private none monitored.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="topology_R77.30.png" style="width: 299px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4633iBB762A669D8C7C2C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="topology_R77.30.png" alt="topology_R77.30.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This interface was then excluded from all availability tests of the cluster (sending CCP packets, ping to IPs in subnet etc.).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Under R80.xx this is gone only private is available and this interface will be monitored:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="topology_R80.30.png" style="width: 261px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4634i91BC2976C4A52C29/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="topology_R80.30.png" alt="topology_R80.30.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any ideas how to create a none monitored interface under R80.xx ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76848#M5909</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-02T12:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL none monitored interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76902#M5913</link>
      <description>Officially, you have to contact the TAC to get the solution, per:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk139252" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk139252&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why it was removed from the UI, I’m not sure.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76902#M5913</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-02T18:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL none monitored interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76905#M5914</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1447"&gt;@Wolfgang&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe this will help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If there are still unused interfaces on cluster members, they must be added to the&lt;/SPAN&gt;$FWDIR/conf/discntd.if&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;configuration file - refer to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk30060" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk30060.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76905#M5914</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-02T19:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL none monitored interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76931#M5915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21670"&gt;@HeikoAnkenbrand&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, that's what I want. We had some problems with the attached switch fabric, but with a "disconnected" interface we can do some troubleshooting without initiating failover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll check if this will be supported with the newer releases, sk article is a little bit old.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 06:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-none-monitored-interface/m-p/76931#M5915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-03T06:47:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

